Live Breaking News & Updates on Professor Turley Isn T
Stay updated with breaking news from Professor turley isn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
And professor turley isn t himself the subject of these proceedings, him changing his mind on this stuff over time is like an interesting thing to note about him as a congressional witness. it s not particularly material to what we are facing in terms of this decision for the congress and the country. but seeing professor turley and seeing michael gerhardt, seeing them both testifying at both of these impeachment hearings for clinton in 98 and for trump today, recognizing that the report of the watergate committee that came in february 1974 was on this same subject, the constitutional grounds for impeachment. it s kind of a good reminder i think that this is part and parcel how we as a country approach presidential impeachments at least in the modern era. there does have to be a reckoning what the constitution says impeachment is for. and considering the impeachment of any particular president rightfully involves a robust discussion and a robust argument that as to whether the preside ....
In his courtroom, professor turley was there arguing on behalf of the republican members of committee that in this case of president trump there s no rush. not everything president trump did has been fully explored, allow this to sift through the courts for a while yet. what s the hurry? so having these four learned law professors argue about the constitutional basis for impeachment today, this is part of how we handle impeachment as a country. and members of the committee fought with each other today and fought with the witnesses and stretched this thing out for over 8 hours. but ultimately the way this is supposed to work is that all the members of the committee, blue and red, republican and democrat, they re all supposed to be left now grappling with their constitutional responsibilities and the now very, very real pertinent question of how exactly they should discharge them. two members of that committee will join us when we come back. stay with us. well, if you conclude that as ....
High did not argue that today the way he did in the clinton impeachment. today he argued the real risk is in impeaching president trump, and that the house should not rush into that because that s such a big scary thing to do. and professor turley isn t himself the subject of these proceedings, him changing his mind on this stuff over time is like an interesting thing to note about him as a congressional witness. it s not particularly material to what we are facing in terms of this decision for the congress and the country. but seeing professor turley and seeing michael garhart, seeing them both testifying at both of these impeachment hearings for clinton in 98 and for trump today, recognizing that the report of the watergate committee that came in february 1974 was on this same subject, the constitutional grounds for impeachment. it s kind of a good reminder i think that this is part and parcel how we as a country approach presidential impeachments at least in the modern era. there d ....
The judiciary committee in the impeachment proceedings against president trump, it was kind of a big constitutional law class, right, with three of these four professors from unc and harvard law and stanford law arguing emphatically the power of impeachment was put in the constitution and assigned to congress the way it was by the framers of our democracy specifically to check and block and potentially remove a president who has done what this impeachment inquiry shows president trump has done. the republican witness, professor turley who we have seen pop up in the clinton impeachment saying president clinton must be impeached and in the judge porteous impeachment where he amazingly was the guy saying actually it s no big deal, this guy should be left alone, who among us doesn t expect that a judge should take thousands of dollars from a case in his courtroom, professor turley was there arguing on behalf of the republican members of committee that in this case of president trump there ....
Electoral process? i believe that the evidentiary record shows wrongful acts of that scale here. the first public hearing of the judiciary committee in the impeachment proceedings against president trump, it was kind of a big constitutional law class, right, with three of these four professors from unc and harvard law and stanford law arguing emphatically the power of impeachment was put in the constitution and assigned to congress the way it was by the framers of our democracy specifically to check and block and potentially remove a president who has done what this impeachment inquiry shows president trump has done. the republican witness, professor turley who we have seen pop up in the clinton impeachment saying president clinton must be impeached and in the judge portious impeachment where he amazingly was the guy saying actually it s no big deal, this guy should be left alone, who among us doesn t expect that a judge should take thousands of dollars from a case ....