He faces legal peril from prosecutors, the stronger his standing among republicans, which is no doubt why his gop rivals largely avoid confronting him for the 91 Felony Counts he faces. Its why in Ron Desantiss prep for next weeks debate, his super pac has advised him to take a hammer to Vivek Ramaswamy but defend trump if trump is attacked by chris christie. Here was some reaction after Fulton County d. A. Fani willis indicted trump and 18 codefendants for state rico violations. South carolina senator tim scott said this. We see the legal system being weaponized against political opponents. That is unamerican and unacceptable. Vivek ramaswamy said that should he become president , he would pardon trump. And he said this. The reality is this, these are politicized persecutions through prosecution. Trumps former Vice President mike pence, who has criticized trump for putting himself above the constitution, says he prefers that trumps fate be decided, quote, by voters, not criminal court
UL provost apologises for latest property controversy
rte.ie - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from rte.ie Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
i said the fighting couple are like republicans, perhaps ready to leave one another or leave trump until such time as an outsider, in this case prosecutors, police, tell them they must separate. then they rebel against their interloper and they stick together, much like republicans stand with trump. had the cop not arrived, they might have left one another, they might have had a divorce. had trump not been indicted, they might have moved to another candidate. professor shane wrote me back with some scientific underpinning of my observation. quote, i can see the parallels. what you describe fits the in-group/out-group theory of human relations. although the in-group members may disagree with one another, they will unite against a common enemy, the out-group. research shows out-group threat has been identified as an important driver of in-group cohesion among humans.
him if he saw parallels to how a couple in a domestic disturbance unites against a police officer in comparison to how trump seems to benefit, at least among republicans, from each indictment. i said, in my theory, the fighting couple are like republicans, perhaps ready to leave one another or leave trump, until such time as an outsider, in this case prosecutors, police, tell them they must separate. then they rebel against their interloper and they stick together, much like republicans stand with trump. had the cop not arrived, they might have left one another, they might have had a divorce. had trump not been indicted, they might have moved to another candidate. i asked professor shane for his thoughts. he wrote me back with scientific underpinning of my observation. he said, i can see the parallels. what you describe fits the in-group/out-group theory of human relations. although the in-group members