their committee in the public. and they re being stonewalled, not responding to testify at all. laura, the former u.s. attorney joyce vance also testified. i want to get your reaction to this exchange with sheila jackson lee where she reads in the mueller rart about the call trump made directing mcgahn to fire mueller. watch this. mcgahn recalled the president saying mueller has to go. and call me back. when you do it, mcgahn understood the president to be saying that the special counsel had to be removed by rosenstein. what do you believe or what is your reaction to this exchange, and would you find such behavior concerning? professor vance and then professor mcquaid. yes, this conduct to me seems to have all the elements prosecutors would need to have to successfully charge obstruction of justice. there s an obstructive act, the effort to go ahead and have the special counsel fired. there s a nexus to an
ideal, but they are working aggressively behind the scenes to try to figure out how to get some of those key people before their committee in the public. and they re being stonewalled, not responding to testify at all. laura, the former u.s. attorney joyce vance also testified. i want to get your reaction to this exchange with sheila jackson lee where she reads in the mueller rart about the call trump made directing mcgahn to fire mueller. watch this. mcgahn recalled the president saying mueller has to go. and call me back. when you do it, mcgahn understood the president to be saying that the special counsel had to be removed by rosenstein. what do you believe or what is your reaction to this exchange, and would you find such behavior concerning? professor vance and then professor mcquaid. yes, this conduct to me seems to have all the elements prosecutors would need to have to successfully charge obstruction of justice. there s an obstructive act, the
professor mcquaid, an expert witness, law professors and former u.s. attorneys, they are familiar with the elements of obstruction of justice. the best evidence would be mueller and mcgahn, would be hope hicks and and others that we ve asked, but they have not complied with subpoenas, so we ve not gotten the best evidence yet. unlike those folks, john dean is not a material witness. even he s very quick to point out. some critics say this appearance is just a show. what do you say to that? it s not just a shoecht the part of it that is a show that s okay. the american public need to be shown what was in the mueller report. i think that s been said only 2% of the people read it. i can understand that. it s not the most it s not page-turner material, so the american people took what barr gave them in the three and a half page synopsis claiming there was no collusion.