take care of that? it focuses the burden much more narrowly. it doesn t seem to me to follow that pregnancy and parenthood are part of the same burden. safe haven laws aim to protect abandoned newborns but justice barrett fails to address women would still be forced to endure unwanted childbirth and full pregnancy terms, pregnancy which many of the men in the republican party may not realize does come with risks. the u.s. has a high maternal mortality rate, one of the highest among developed nations and black women are more than three times more likely to have a maternal death than white women. pregnancy and the common complications that arise could be difficult for any woman but especially for those without health care, family support or an employer that offers sick leave which brings us back to gilead. republicans love to say they re pro-life but the more accurate term is they re probirth. because once that baby sborn,
what do you see from your audience, what they want to know more about. if in all or most cases, even among catholics, 51% of catholics say it should be legal in most cases. 58%. do you sense that divide within your broadcasting world? i think ewtn viewers are catholics and attending mass regularly. my viewers keep my on my toes, they are closely follow prolife legislation. if i don t cover one specific bill, they ask, how come you didn t cover this. they prioritize life in the voting booth. when you say prioritize life, they re so focused on the 40 weeks for pregnancy. and not the 40 or 80 years of a person s life after that. there s a misconception that the prolifers are only probirth.