it s victimhood. only today could people more pampered and celebrated than you are claim to be victims of the rest of us. like sharing a bucket of sardines with joy behar, there is only so much victimhood to go around. going to greater loenths to extract new sources of whining or mining for whining, led by meghan rappinoe, and now happily endorsed biological men playing women s sports, especially now that she no longer plays. the men are victims, not the girls they replace or beat. we are trying to legislate away people s full humanity. now we care about women s sports, that is total show me the trans people taking advantage of being trans in sports, it is just not happening. well, meghan, it is happening. she is right in one respect, no one cares about women s sports, as much as we care about fairness or line cutting. the line to the winner s circle is shorter if you are a dude playing women s sports. tennis legend navratilova, single work, yikes. she once called me an ass
dana: i m dana perino with joe jeanine pirro, jessica tarlov, jesse watters, and greg gutfeld. 5:00 in new york city, and this is the five. embattled harvard president claudine gai resigning is the most powerful school leader in the country. 50 allegations of plagiarism s, and that shortest presidency and the university s history: six months. gay not mentioning either of the scandals in a statement, but seems to imply that racism was a factor in her ouster. she said it was frightening to be suggested to personal attacks and threats fueled by racial animus. it started when she cannot answer this question in front of congress. the answer is yes that calling for the of jews violates harvard code of conduct, correct? it depends on the context. it does not. the answer is yes. this is why you should resign. dana: congresswoman elise stefanik s says it s only the beginning. we have seen a failure of leadership from claudine gay, and a failure of academic integr
house. don t worry, though, biden s lawyers have everything under control. we just got exclusive video of their consensual search. there you go. they left no stone unturned. meanwhile there are a lot of lingering questions, but biden s unqualified talking head is not too keen on answering them. after a special counsel is named, but before the fbi searched, president biden went to his house in wilmington. what was he doing there? i would refer you to the white house counsel. was it something related to this case? i would refer you to the white house counsel s office. okay. do you think the story was leaked by someone trying to bruise the president politically ahead of a re-election announcement? i would refer you to the white house counsel s office. we know the president did it. why did he do it? i would refer you to the white house counsel. greg: she s the best. so let s check in with the white house counsel s office. there are many people out there in the
tax dollars in electric you about how immoral you are. that is liberalism distilled. it s been going on long time. npr has been running its particular scam since 1971, but the sneering tone you hear on npr has been a hallmark of liberals. a century. liberals have contempt for dwight eisenhower after barry goldwater and for richard nixon, boy did they, and for gerald ford even. if you re old enough to remember ronald reagan, you will recall vividly how liberals felt about him. reagan was an idiot, they told you, a mouth breather, and so was anybody who would vote for him, very much including you. in the words of al gore, republicans were the extra chromosome right wing, so they were really genetically defective. that s how liberals actually talk. whenever two or more liberals are gathered, you will find sanctimony. but there s a new inflection. you may have noticed it recently. the pivot and it was a pivot came six years ago. it was during the 2016 president a campaign.
ingraham angle from washington. thank you for being with us. putting evil in context, that s the focus of tonight s angle. more fallout from the hill testimony from college presidents who have equivocating on the antisemitism atmosphere on their campuses. some of the most revealing and disturbing exchanges are just now being seen by americans. specifically calling for genocide of jews, does that constitute bullying and harassment? if directed, it is harassment. so yes? it is condepend not decision. calling for genocide of jews is depending on the context? if the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment, yes. laura: surely the esteemed harvard university president had a much clearer response. at harvard does calling for genocide much jews violate bullying or harassment, yes or no? it can be depending on the context? what is the context? targeted as an individual, crossing into conduct that is bullying, harassment, intimidation, that is actionable condu