Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
russia has just lost its appeal to build a new embassy a stone s throw from parliament house. the government passed legislation to prevent russia from using that land, claiming a potential national security threat. cnn s angus watson joins me from sydney. where do they go from here? does russia have any other recourse now? reporter: well, john, the strange conclusion to this story might just have arrived. australian affiliates are reporting that a lone russian diplomat who has squatted on the site of this previouslily proposed new russian embassy in canberra has now left. he was spotted last week after the australian government moved to evict russia from the site. he was spotted coming out of a small cabin on the construction site to smoke cigarettes and pick up takeaway food orders. the government didn t quite know what to do with him because he had diplomatic immunity. so a police car was out front, and in the end, they just waited
friendships with reid from chuck schumer to minority leader mitch mcconnell. president biden writing, if harry said he would do something, he did it. if he gave you his word, you could bank on it. that s how he got things done for the good of the country for decades. that is a bygone era but eternal principle. let s get to suzanne malveaux in washington live for more. or good morning, john and kaitlan. many are waking up to shocking news. he was larger than life here in washington. he dominated, impacted the political landscape like very few and put his home state on the map in his influence over who would lead at the highest level. his lovely wife and high school sweetheart said he died previouslily following his four-year battle with pancreatic cancer. he was a force to be reckoned
this was bad conduct. it was intentional. so i i do think that as we see this move on, move forward, that anybody that was involved in those malicious activities is gone. so a little bit about policy and procedures, just very quickly.it the ig s office has previouslily identified a pattern of leaks and improper contact between fbi employees and the media. part of the decision to work the crossfire hurricane case out of the fbi headquarters. it does seem to be due to the fear of leaks, if it were actually worked out in the field. so can you characterize how much of a problem leaks are? and those unauthorized contacts between the media and members within the fbi?be so we identified this last year in our clinton collection report. the number ofec contacts. and we ve seen it as we ve sedo
perceived here, if you talk to gun control proponents, they really have tried to argue previouslily, these people pushing for expanded background checks, pushing to regulate certain firearms to get rid of certain firearms like the ar-15 what they really want is to confiscate weapons. that s not a message that goes over well particularly in conservative leaning states. red states like texas, states like west virginia. so for gun control proponents, including this president, to actually now have a prominent figure a prominent proponent of gun control arguing for a full repeal of the second amendment by ratifying the constitution as i said it gives them leverage. it gives them a concrete op-ed to point to and say this is what they want. we are not lying when we say that. jon: i was a little surprised to see justice stevens saying abolishing the second amendment would be simple. tinkering with the constitution is never simple and there is obviously going to be a huge upswell of opinion,