Stay updated with breaking news from Preemption issue. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
It s not as if the obama administration hasn t on the border security side, which is very important to me and to arizona, and i m sure to the congressman. the issue is that congress needs to appropriate more funds and more resources. but right now but barring that, you can understand why a state would want to act. well, they may want to act, but they acted incorrectly. they acted in a way that preempts federal authority, but it s also discriminatory. the brief of the justice department talks about racial profiling potentially happening besides the preemption issue. it also talks about harming a relationship with another country. right now we have six mexican border governors refusing to attend a yearly border conference with american border governors because of this incident, because of this issue in arizona. so it is harming our foreign ....
Laws we tacked about. we put safeguards in that the federal law doesn t have you ve got the obama administration trying continue policy into a lawsuit to maintain their nonenforcement mentality and agenda this is about amnesty. it interferes. interior enforcement is 75%. this administration is doing everything they can not to enforce the law. then sue the americans siding with those who break into our country, and president calderon who came to our house and criticized our law and citizens while they ignore the damage and cost of millions and deaths and maimings and jobs taken from americans. i ve never seen anything so upside down this is the most callally written lawsuit, you are right, no the they talk about preem , there s never, let me repeat, never has there been a preemption issue on ....
In other words, federal law trumps state law. how can you take issue with that? you do take issue. enforcement is not regulatory and the courts have ruled on. thiss the the 5th, 6th, 10th, others have ruled on this state s unher rent authority to enforce the law. congress not wanted us tone force this law, they could have used what are called plenary powers. they have never done that absent that, through the supremacy clause, state views the responsibility to enforce the launch the misinformation thought is outrageous. the obama administration simply filing suit, a political lawsuit if you will, cause they have no leg to stand on under the preemption issue. they are simply trying to enforce their current policy of known force.and amnesty. that s what it s about they are not worried about profiles and this bill prohibits it. not worried about what lawful contact s the united states supreme court in a landmark decision said if you have a lawful contact, you don t need reasonable suspi ....
Be enforced. we haven t seen it enforced yet. that starts july 29th depending on this lawsuit. that was the problem tonight. on the preemption issue, since bush did it. if you were president, would you preempt and say this is a federal issue, or would you let all the states write their own laws? i think part of the issue that conservatives are making here in essence, the arizona law is consistent with the law, the federal laws on the books, which have not been enforced. ultimately the answer and what i hope happens here is i hope the arizona law becomes a point. i hope the federal government sees this as a sign that they have to start securing the border. i think that s the ultimate answer to the problem. on the next issue. an army intelligence analyst accused of leaking the video is now facing criminal charges. private first class bradleymanning is facing 12 ....
Appeal ruled on state actions, which basically enforced this arrest of illegal aliens. the fourth, 5th, 8th, 9th, 10th circuit courts of appeals. that means little to me. first of all, on the preemption issue, it is preemptive, it is a doctrine that talks about the supremacy clause and has it been historically a federal matter and it has been a matter of national concern and it s not up to the state to impose its will and i think it is far more stringent than anything on the federal books and i don t think it is something similar to or consistent with federal law and, the final thing, gregg is what you have to do with all of the citations you cited, all have factual differences and distinctions and i don t think any of the cases you could cite in any circuit would mirror or parallel the law. clayton: i ll cite one, too, why did one of the most federal ....