about what they saw in that market in that province, and all of them said they saw the taliban pointing their guns at these commandos as they were surrendering, walking out with arms in the air and then the taliban shot them. these are people, john, who didn t have to speak to us. they are risking their lives by talking to us, speaking out against the taliban. the ministry of defense has said that these are war crimes, but it s not the first time that the taliban has executed the military or innocent civilians. and embassy international described it as war crimes and cold-blooded murder. this evidence suggests that the taliban s persistent claim to changed their ways are predicated on a lie. and completely undermines their claims that they will respect human rights in the peace process. the fact of the matter is this is a pr nightmare for the
podcast, to try to impress is that the only reason that they got caught? other people are almost certainly still doing this. it is really not complicated. like slot machine basically. so it is still happening. again, turn this on. amazon doesn t really want to tell you how to do this because it would blow up this pr nightmare that they already have. so please do it. i just want to confirm, how hard is to track these people who aren t publicizing on a ridiculous podcast? yeah, it is complicated. if they are stupid, they are not doing it through the vpn which masks your behavior. if you are stupid, you get caught pretty easily. i don t think that they thought that they would get caught, which is kind of nuts. but there are people who know how to do this in a way that they will never get caught. and so you ve got to up your scare a little bit here. le coa lcollins, super impor. i m thinking if my daughter had been targeted like that, i d be
columnist for the new york times. you re a supporter of kaepernick. i like the jersey you ve got on. what s your reaction to this abrupt location change for his workout? it s par for the course of this whole saga, if you will. ever since it was reported that colin kaepernick was protesting during the national anthem, you ve seen the messaging from the until go from we support first amendment rights to we need to get rid of him to we re not black balling him to we are now going to settle the lawsuit to this out of nowhere workout that caught everyone including colin kaepernick off guard to now a confusion in location. the whole thing has been a pr nightmare from the nfl s perspective. it s been three years since he left. since then there was a private kaepernick s former
i m glad you asked that question. they don t make a ton of money. only 0.5% of their ad revenue is from political advertising. even though it s out there they are making money off of this. elizabeth warren saying facebook is making a ton of money. they are not. it s not worth 0.5% of your revenue to go through what they are going through right now. i think zuckerberg is going around how do i handle this? the best thing i can do is follow the law. what i would do if i were on their board of directors i would say just don t run political ads. like twitter? they should. they really should either evolve the policy and say we are going to fact check it or go in and say we don t want the pr nightmare around this and we don t want the revenue around this and back off and say we are not running political ads any more and a clean, crisp logical thing for them to do and why they are setting themselves up for legislation, which is the worst outcome for them because
and change its policy. at what point is free speechs a censorship? the problem is that politicians can then go in and lie and say something that is not true. zuckerberg is saying, hands off. we will let the political consumer make a judgment believe it or not they believe this politician or not and the policy we are going to follow and it s created a pr nightmare for them and blowing up in their face and a lot of people are pushing back on it saying that is not right to allow people to go ahead and lie. it makes it sound like they are being lazy. they don t want to verify what they are allowing on their site. yeah. here is the issue is they have third-party fact checkers for all other advertising. however, with politicians, they go in and say we are not going to do third-party fact checkers.