In BPP v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. The Court found that to consider a fax to be an unlawful advertisement on the basis of a remote or minor commercial purpose would vastly broaden the TCPA’s definition of unsolicited advertisement.
Thanks to the decision in Facebook v. Duguid, 2021 will go down as one of the most significant years in the history of the TCPA. Here are some cases worthy of note as we enter the new year regarding advertising, class certification, do-not-call and vicarious liability.
Thanks to the decision in Facebook v. Duguid, 2021 will go down as one of the most significant years in the history of the TCPA. Here are some cases worthy of note as we enter the new year regarding advertising, class certification, do-not-call and vicarious liability.
question under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act TCPA – was a fax an unsolicited advertisement? – was presented to Judge Matthew T. Schelp in BPP v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and WellTok, Inc. in Eastern District of Missouri