classified documents case. evidence that paints a potentially damning portrait of efforts by the expresident in the expresident s push to retrieve important and sensitive security documents from that washington post report, quote, two of donald trump s employees moved boxes of papers the day before fbi agents and a prosecutor visited the former president s florida home to retrieve classified documents in response to a subpoena. timing that investigators have come to view as suspicious, and an indication of possible obstruction. according to people familiar with the matter. trump and his aides allegedly carried out a dress rehearsal for moving sensitive papers, even before his office received the may 2022 subpoena. that is according to people familiar with the matter who spoke anonymously to describe a sensitive ongoing investigation. the washington post has new details on a question that has loomed over the entire investigation. what did donald trump do with his trove of
with jack smith s team. those lawyers, especially the most prominent one very recently have been working closely for a number of powerful tech companies including twitter. the litigation they were involved in in that courtroom was under seal which means we as the public don t know what the dispute was over. but it just highlights the extent to what so much of what jack smith is doing is not public but could in the coming weeks and months before public. do you have any reporting along the lines of timing? bloomberg is i think the only outlet reporting and the sourcing is people familiar with the matter that days after memorial day is what their sources tell them jack smith s timing may be on the documents? we don t. the bloomberg reporters on that byline are great. i have no reason to think what they re reporting is wrong.
and george soros. when they say they are looking to promote diversity equity and inclusion in reality they re using audits to move operatives into top positions in powerful tech companies in order to do their bidding. listen to the president of a left wing organization entitled color of change rashad robinson he testified in front of congress last week and he called for independent auditors to review new products from tech companies before they re release to the public. this gives auditors, of course, carte blanche, final say over technology we are allowed to use. so are tech companies open to taking orders from radical groups? it seems so. the washington free beacon reports in 2018 color of change successfully pushed facebook into completing an audit that called for more restrictions on trump s posts. after the audit was released facebook then hired an obama administration justice
that is the main topic of our, the title of our hearing today. protecting kids online. the recent revelations about facebook s effects on children and its plan to target younger audiences are indeed disturbing and i think you re going to see a lot of bipartisan concern about this today and in future hearings. they just, they show how urgent it is for congress to act against powerful tech companies on behalf of children and the broader public. and i say powerful tech companies, they are possessive of immense, immense power. their product is addictive and people on both sides of this dias are concerned about this.