Stay updated with breaking news from Power argument. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Court with the muslim ban is they refuse to acknowledge the president was acting in bad faith. i know liberals want to look at the press conference, the disaster and say, oh, trump admitted there s no emergency. that s true, but the supreme court has a documented history of ignoring the fact that the president is lying and acting in bad faith and acting on his directives anyway. i do think that protect democracy is or the people already suing, they are representing el paso, the california attorney general, they are going to sue very quickly. there is a very, very, very good separation of power argument. the president cannot declare a national emergency because nancy pelosi gave him a wedgie. we don t know if they have the strength to stand-up to the president because they haven t in the past. we didn t need that visual ....
Free to interpret the law and any other way, so it is not accurate to say that the law was struck down. it is very much still in force. this ruling will be taken up on appeal, and that is where the issue will be decided. i predict with a very high degree of confidence, and this judge will be reversed on appeal. wendy, you mentioned the spirit remains will rita. the judge s ruling. as a matter of constitutional separation of powers, that procedure cannot be modified. he does say it, separate of power argument. wendy, your thoughts? i have to tell you. this is a very controversial law. it is much more than shoot first. that is one of the reasons it is so controversial. there s a lot to it. it has to be a reasonable belief that one s life is in danger, and that deadly force is necessary. the really it goes like this. he says, the legislature, ....
Was this really that much of a part of the case before the court, the whole issue of the tax? we thought it was the commerce clause. governor we were totally blind sided and i ll tell you even the lower courts, who went against that, rejected the taxing power argument. so, no other court ruled that way, even in the even in the federal government s briefing, they didn t even start talking about the taxing power until page 52 and it was only 63 pages long, i mean, do any of us really believe that congress intended to tax the uninsured? of course not. and, president obama and the democrats never, ever pitched this as you said as a tax. this was pitched as a penalty. and, what happened, what we saw happen in front of the supreme court, was they chose to rewrite the law, not interpret it, in my opinion. ken cuccinelli we often hear the term, judicial activism. ....
Was this really that much of a part of the case before the court, the whole issue of the tax? we thought it was the commerce clause. governor we were totally blind sided and i ll tell you even the lower courts, who went against that, rejected the taxing power argument. so, no other court ruled that way, even in the even in the federal government s briefing, they didn t even start talking about the taxing power until page 52 and it was only 63 pages long, i mean, do any of us really believe that congress intended to tax the uninsured? of course not. and, president obama and the democrats never, ever pitched this as you said as a tax. this was pitched as a penalty. and, what happened, what we saw happen in front of the supreme court, was they chose to rewrite the law, not interpret it, in my opinion. ken cuccinelli we often hear the term, judicial activism. ....
What kind of power congress will have in taxing. was this really that much of a part of the case before the court, the whole issue of the tax? we thought it was the commerce clause. governor we were totally blind sided and i ll tell you even the lower courts, who went against that, rejected the taxing power argument. so, no other court ruled that way, even in the even in the federal government s briefing, they didn t even start talking about the taxing power until page 52 and it was only 63 pages long, i mean, do any of us really believe that congress intended to tax the uninsured? of course not. and, president obama and the democrats never, ever pitched this as you said as a tax. this was pitched as a penalty. and, what happened, what we saw happen in front of the supreme court, was they chose to rewrite the law, not interpret it, in my opinion. ken cuccinelli we often hear ....