Live Breaking News & Updates on Potential Litigant
Stay updated with breaking news from Potential litigant. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
judge to appoint a special master, an independent third party, to review what the fbi seized at his florida estate. trump also wants a more detailed receipt of what was taken by the feds. and for the government to return any seized documents that were, quote, not within the scope of the search warrant. while trump attempted to get his hands on those records, investigators are trying to track down additional surveillance footage from mar-a-lago. according to the new york times, this marks the second demand for security video of activity around where the documents were stored, leading up to the fbi s search. and, in a cnn exclusive, we have learned the justice department has issued a new grand jury subpoena to the national archives. they want more documents in the investigation into the january 6th attack on the u.s. capitol. let s begin with the fallout from the fbi search of mar-a-lago, cnn s senior crime and justice reporter katelyn polantz following with the lates ....
Legal response from the former president s team to doj, and what kaitlan just outlined here in terms of what they re asking for, and i think one of the key questions that remains is that message from one of trump s lawyers to doj intended for attorney general merrick garland directly that katelyn referenced, saying people are angry, let me know what i can do to bring the pressure down. given potential obstruction is one of the things they re investigating here, how would a comment like that not just it is rare, how could that potentially play into any obstruction investigation? well, poppy, first of all, it is astonishing that this comment was made and that it is now being acknowledged. for a potential litigant, a person who is being investigated potentially to try to reach out directly to the attorney general is outrageous and terrible judgment. you have to look at what the message itself is. ....
Happening in the 12th district. when all is said and done, as you have said, when it is all over and the votes are all counted, someone is going to be looking for a new job. now that this district here, district 12, has been redrawn in the upper west side of manhattan, you have carolyn maloney up against jerry nadler, both of them in congress for more than 30 years. they have served on powerful committees. basically they re being challenged by the young progressive upstart, 38 years old, suraj patel. he says it is time for new blood in washington, d.c. throughout the campaign, both of the other candidates, maloney and nadler, have been saying it is not the time for new blood, you need seasoned people there in d.c. maloney saying not only do you need someone who is seasoned, the person who should be sent back to d.c. should be a woman. there is one thing that remains that i have not been able to do, and that is to ....
Page posted an op-ed by kavanaugh, expressing regret for his behavior on thursday. i was emotional on thursday, i was there as a son, husband and dad. is that good enough for you? not good enough by any means, chris, because that performance was so filled with arrogance and acrimony, rage and revenge, literally threatening senators. it was a kind of unmasking, a revelation. and it is the reason that john paul stevens, a former justice of the supreme court said it was disqualifying. why other judges and lawyers around the country have said that they believe that it was disqualifying. no judge should threaten a potential litigant. and by the way, in blumenthal versus trump, a lawsuit on the clause i am a potential ....
Acrimony, rage and revenge, literally threatening senators. it was a kind of unmasking, a revelation. and it is the reason that john paul stevens, a former justice of the supreme court said it was disqualifying. why other judges and lawyers around the country have said that they believe that it was disqualifying. no judge should threaten a potential litigant. and by the way, in blumenthal versus trump, a lawsuit on the clause i am a potential litigant, threatened potential lawyers who may appear before him, that issue of temperament is now front and center.m, and that so-called apology, it d was really a non-apology, more like an explanation, is far from good enough for me. i republicans who were briefed on that fbi report that interviewed, we think, around po ten witnesses say, basically, it clears their guy. they re forging ahead. ....