hundreds of sub postmasters were wrongly proscuted for theft and false accounting over a period of many years. mps cross examined a current boss of fujitsu, the company behind the failed horizon it system he apologised for its part in the scandal, and said that the company had a moral obligation to contribute to compensation for the victims. here s our business correspondent, marc ashdown. no one ever says sorry, not in the way i would like to see sorry. former postmistress jo way i would like to see sorry. former postmistressjo hamilton centre stage today, giving evidence to mps about how she was wrongly convicted for stealing is £36,000 from her post office, her life ruined. it from her post office, her life ruined. , ., ~ , ,, from her post office, her life ruined. , .,~ , ., , ruined. it “ust makes you so angry that ruined. it ust makes you so angry that the ruined. itjust makes you so angry that they literally ruined. itjust makes you so angry that they literal
bars, have not said anything and we think it is time they broke their vow of silence and tell us what was known by who and when, whether they feel a moral obligation at least, to contribute to a compensation bill of hundreds of millions of pounds. his committee also wants to know when the victims will get their full and final compensation, as well as a deadline for when justice will finally be done. emma simpson, bbc news. live now to charlie rose outside the post office inquiry in central london. what are we going to hear today? london. what are we going to hear toda ? , , ., ., today? this inquiry into what has been described today? this inquiry into what has been described as today? this inquiry into what has been described as their - today? this inquiry into what has been described as their biggest l been described as their biggest miscarriage ofjustice this country has seen appears to finally be building up a head of steam. today we are hearing from the japanese tech
i had little input into that inquiry. i was there on the day of the interview but any pre or post work would have been by the person in charge of the inquiry. i5 person in charge of the inquiry. is a you had nothing to do with endorsing the content of the report? no. , ., endorsing the content of the report? no. , . , ., , no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when - no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when janet . that she was shocked when janet skinner was charged with theft. where you? this skinner was charged with theft. where you? skinner was charged with theft. where ou? a , where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. i - where you