Parteienrechtler: Anträge auf Ausschluss von Wagenknecht und Lafontaine chancenlos
Lafontaine und Wagenknecht, hier bei der Berlinale 2017. Bild: Maximilian Bühn, CC-BY-SA 4.0
Jurist Morlok prüfte für Telepolis zwei Gesuche gegen die beiden Polit-Promis. Zentrale Argumente demnach nicht belastbar. Vertreter der Partei hatten Initiativen zuvor kritisiert
Neue Anträge auf Ausschluss der ehemaligen Linken-Fraktionsvorsitzenden im Bundestag, Sahra Wagenknecht, und des amtierenden Vorsitzenden der Fraktion im Saarland, Oskar Lafontaine, haben nach Einschätzung des Parteienrechtsexperten Martin Morlok keine Aussicht auf Erfolg. Bei der Lektüre habe ich den Eindruck, dass es sich bei den Verfassern zwar um engagierte Leute handelt, denen aber die Gäule durchgegangen sind , sagte der emeritierte Jurist und Experte für Parteienrecht gegenüber
of trying to squeeze it out of power. two senators, cuban-american, denounced the agreement. this policy contradiction is absurd. it is disgraceful for a president who claims to treasure human rights and human freedom. we have seen for six years under this administration is we have been consistently alienating our friends and allies. at the same time, coddling our enemies. you heard marco rubio. he vowed to block the ambassador nomination to cuba. cuba admits to harboring fugitives wanted by the united states, including some accused ever terrorism. one of the most contention parts of the agreement is release of three cubans convicted of espionage in the united states. this is their arrival back in cuba after their release. the final members of the
fidel castro s brother still at the helm has erupted into another political firestorm. this policy contradiction is absurd. and it is disgraceful for a president who claims to treasure human rights and human freedom. reporter: especially from hispanic lawmakers who felt left out of the discussion. some possibly running for president next round. we ve been consistently alienating and abandoning our friends and allies and, at the same time, appeasing and coddling our enemies. first it was russia, then iran and today it s cuba. reporter: and not only republicans. it s a fallacy to believe that cuba will reform because an american president opens his hands ands castro brothers will suddenly unclench their fists. reporter: president obama spent a day explaining. we want to see greater freedom, greater prosperity, greater opportunity for ordinary cubans. reporter: this, the first time an american president has
this policy contradiction is absurd and disgraceful for a president who claims to treasure human rights and human freedom. this president is the single worst neg gesh yotiator in the house in my life time. who has given the cuban government everything it asked for. and received no assurances of any advances in democracy and freedom in return. do you know where he is coming from? his parents are cuban immigrants. do you know where he is coming fru from with that? personal pain. i think it is important for people to remember that, don. this is a community that has felt a lot of personal pain. it s not the same to read a history book about cuba than it is to hear the painful stories from your parents and grandparents. i can tell you that, marco rubio s father died without being able to go back to cuba. and there are so many people here who have died waiting for
has been mixed. that you might expect but what s kind of a surprise, it s not exactly falling along party lines. yeah, basically a number of cuban-american lawmakers are especially unhappy and it s really the person most vocal is florida senator marco rubio. take a listen. this policy contradiction is absurd and it is disgraceful for a president who claims to treasure human rights and human freedom. this president is the single worst negotiator we ve had in the white house in my lifetime. he has basically given the cuban government everything it s asked for and received no assurances for democracy and freedom in return. i think that our policy has done more to keep the castros in power than anything. and so i think it s high time for a change, 50 years is long enough and that we ought to do this and do whatever we can so