Continuance to october 24. It is now proposed for continuance to october 10, 2019. No other items for continuance and no speaker cards. President melgar do any member of the public wish to speak on the matter of continuance . Jonas i apologize, commissioners. Items 14a and b, for case number 2016001794, 95 hawthorne street, shadow findings, we received a request to continue this matter to october 10th, 2019. And under your discretionary review, 19a and b for case numbers 002545env90 at 2417 green street president melgar sorry to interrupt you. Commissioner richards needs to recuse himself from one of the items proposed for continuance, so i believe we have to vote on that first. Jonas we do, but if i could just read them into the record. You could let us know which one you need to recuse yourself from. Again, items 19a and b for case number 2417 green street. An appeal of the preliminary negative declaration and discretionary review. We received a request from the Supervisors Office to
It out for ficus. We have it at the directors order, that talks about this being a tree by tree evaluation. It is not a death sentence. The ficus trees that we have identified for removal have poor structure. There are a lot of ficus tree that we are keeping in the city. We did have an unfortunate situation, it is outlined in my brief, in the resulting decision. When i was out come on vacation, had a colleague who said i think the posting. For 16th street is completed. Was this protested . Was the 16th street phase one trees protested . This is a colic that has one more Year Experience than i do here, so shes been here for a little longer, by one year. They did not look at map zero, they looked at google, a place them on east side 280. She believed those protests do not apply to these trees. We gave a contractor a sort of verbal and written email saying, no, those are not protested, those can be removed. The contractor technically should have waited for a permit. But, the reason we hav
Walton, present. Mr. President , all members are present. Thank you. The San Francisco board of supervisors we acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. Please join me in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Mad
Mr. President , all members are present. Thank you. The San Francisco board of supervisors we acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. Please join me in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Madam clerk , do we
I try to look at it not academically, but what does it get us in terms of the actual space that theyre trying to do. And in this case, thered be no difference because whether they do. 5 or. 75, theres excavation that theyre going to do to provide that one story beneath which will be the garage parking spaces, and so going to. 5 provides fewer spaces overall, but its the same level of construction and the same physical footprint of the building, so its not like were eliminating an extra floor of excavation or anything. I keep pointing back to it, ill say it every single time. These parking spaces, even when you go in when people are home, spaces are empty. People dont have cars. You go in these buildings, and its just emptiness, so thats a reuse of parking, okay with. 75 here because i dont see that going to. 5 really gets us anything rather than except for space in the below ground excavation space. Commissioner moore makes a fantastic point about the union street west facing facade. I