Bombay High Court Temporarily Restrains Pune s Regal Footwear From Using Regal Trademark Case Title: Abdul Rasul Nurallah Virjee and Anr. v. Regal Footwear Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 12 .
Nominal Index [Citation 1 – 300]World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. v. One OTT Intertainment Ltd. In Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 1Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency 2023.
Nominal Index [Citation 1 – 313]World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. v. One OTT Intertainment Ltd. In Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 1Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency 2023.
Nominal Index [Citation 176 - 222]The Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Bhagyashri Ganesh Gaikwad 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 176A v. B 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 177X v. Y 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 178Anil.
The Bombay High Court refused to grant interim relief to PhonePe for alleged infringement of its trademark “PhonePe” by Resilient Innovations’ trademark “postpe”. Justice Manish Pitale cited .