Have to worry about the sentencing guidelines. So i hear you on that. Let me bounce this to you, garber, because wheres the there there . There is no case. I get the sentencing guidelines, but we dont even have charges. So what is there to flip on, and what would he have to flip with . Yeah. So heres the problem. Ive represented a lot of folks under investigation, and the problem is before you even get to the sentencing guidelines, theres the investigation. I mean think of Michael Cohen. Think of being him and having your office raided, reading about yourself every day in the newspaper, having your career taken away from you, everything, and potentially losing your livelihood, everything, everything, everything. And that, that notion alone, focuses the mind. All right. And many of us in the media, we talk to Michael Cohen. I certainly do. This has been difficult for him, but we still dont know what the case is about, so we really dont know where the sympathies should lie. Another point
candidate in the primary made that happen really. and just like you wouldn t want to hide your views in 1860 on abolition, you should stand proud about what were doing as a party with the republican party is doing on abortion. that said, stop taking cues from the left, women s number one issue is not abortion. there are ten other issues ahead of that and if you saw at the iowa fair, you saw rfk junior speaking to those issues he was talking about the economy, he was talking about food, he was talking about big corporations making us fatter and sicker and how do we make our family s health or, he is talking about chronic diseases. there are so many issues that matter to women more than abortion and if we allow the left to take the lead on that we will lose. you have to come out with new issues. joey: i understand thought the
vellum or parchment by someone who had no idea of the capital of south dakota or the name of the senator in new york or whatever. more broadly, do you worry that that the fact that we can know everything is making us dumber? no. i thought initially i think when i started writing this book i think that was the premise is everything that began with the invention of the electronic calculator by a man called jerry merriman, wonderful name, in 196 1k37 7, and that began the rant and we did not need to know how to calculate, how to spell how to find out where we were and how to know anything and initially i thought it would make us dumber and it s made us fatter and flabbier and the mental ones, would they make our brains dumber? i mean, the ultimate question is would it remove the possibility of wisdom from society because
how to spell, how to find out where we were and how to know anything. and then initially i thought this is going to make us dumber. it is made us fatter and flabbier, the physical labor saving devices but the mental ones will it make our brains dumber? will it and the ultimate question will it remove the possibility of wisdom from society. because wisdom is a lot of knowledge multiplied by a lot of age. old, wise people. we need them in society. but then i thought, well, wait a minute. maybe what all of the devices are doing is actually purging our brains of the stuff we don t need. because with great respect to the people of south dakota, we don t need to know the capital or the fact that it is called pierre not pierre. it is like holding on a brain under a cold tap and getting unnecessary stuff away. leaving us like plato, and arrogant that might be to say, enable us to think the important things in life. so i m quite optimistic.