Its got to be much more subtle than that. It got to be about helping each side see where there might be limited areas where they could work together. Im not the great believer in the grand bargain. Now sit down and have a discussion about every in. It is unlikely to be good but they will be some areas where people have quite significant differences and nonetheless have it limited junior level of communication which delivers from a practical benefit to both sides. We will obviously return in some detail of course and the next session. The secretary has made it very clear [inaudible] there is a general concern that we seem to lack a strategy on the full spectrum response with their business is taking them on when it comes to do social media before we even get into iraq with the iraq ema to make significant programs and indeed perhaps a more direct relationship with the kurds in trying to combat. The putting all that aside can you tell us what you would hope to achieve from participation
Worked very hard to manage those alignments so it doesnt create too great a tension. As time goes on, ive seen greater congruence in our views, not less. If i could follow one piece, you did mention that youre just back from ankara, the role and the relationship with turkey has been complicated, its been vital, its been seen as quite tense at times. It seems youre quite optimistic right now. So, one of my questions there, you see, for example, the kurdish being an effective force fighting within syria, but again, this is sort of just to get to one area where there are differences potentially differences between Coalition Members on how to approach a particular ontheground partner. How do you see that kind of dynamic playing out . Well, its its actually been naturally pretty remarkable what the kurdish elements in syria have done to eliminate daesh from a large segment of the border. There is still a border which is in the hands of daesh and thats problematic, and its an issue for the w
This recent poll done by pen sean and burr land. Robert green joining us to talk about it. Mr. Green, thanks for your time. Thank you, sir. Up next on cspan3, a look at the dodd frank Financial Regulations five years after they were signed into law. Well hear from House Financial Services chair Jeb Henserling on the law. And thomas perez talks about regulating retirement financial advisers. Later, a discussion on islamic extremism. When congress is in session, cspan3 brings you more of the best access to congress with live coverage of hearings, news conferences, and key Public Affairs events. And every weekend its American History tv traveling to historic sites, discussions with authors and historians, and eyewitness accounts of events that define the nation. Cspan3, coverage of congress, and the American History tv. President obama signed the dodd Financial Regulation into law five years ago. Up next, a panel talks about the different provisions of the law including the creation of th
Use by executive land holding agencies. In your opinion do you believe that gsa has done everything in its power to give life to the directives embodied in section 6409 which you referenced in your testimony of middle class tax relief act . Have they done everything they can . Mr. Chairman, i do not believe they have. As a matter of fact, im a former administrator myself of the federal agency and if i had implemented something too poorly that congress instructed me to do id be embarrassed. Theres an executive order by the president of the United States correcting gsa to move faster to get these contracts together and to date nothing has been done. Three years after Congress Enact this legislation, progress has been slow gsa hasnt been proactive. Proactive. I think our members are having to negotiate for each and every site individually just as they have in the past. Gsa has not implemented the intent of congress and we cant wait three more years for whats needed i think today. Theres a
Live coverage underway now here on cspan2. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] good afternoon. I am the executive director of the center for law economic the finest here at gw. The senate as a think tank is on to be a focal point in d. C. For the study integrated major issues, this is a law, entrepreneurship. We are excited about todays program. We have the best, so the best experts coming with different perspectives to discuss the use housing cost the 2000 financial crisis, what is the right policy for the future course for all audience members we are live right now on cspan2. So just so you know so they can ask questions, you will be broadcast to the world. Before we continue i would like to introduce you to the dean who is elderly Family Public service at gw law school. Thank you to ill be brief. I just want to express my thanks to all the different Peter Wallison with whom i agree on many things but disagree on many others. I bought this bo