and i welcome you watching the weekly here in r.t. international where we look back at the main stories of the last 7 days and of course it is the pandemic that has dominated so let s give you the latest numbers on that more than 685000 cases have now been confirmed globally one 146000 people have recovered but more than 32000 have died. ok well let s start with events in russia because the government here has just introduced new measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus starting this monday self isolation at home will be imposed in moscow for people of all ages but it ghastly it has more. well it s important to make a distinction between what came into a text yesterday which was. entertainment venue such as restaurants parks and cafes shut citizens moscow residents were to stay in their homes to self isolate and restrict all unnecessary travel what what these new amendments that they re making to this quarantine century this court is going from soft to hard to say you kn
and do what he has to do. you will get a do-nothing congress. they hate trump. they were buddy buddy. is ted cruz, but he all his legislation, i m afraid he doesn t believe in executive orders. those are things that will have to get done because you will not get things through congress. trouble get everything straight. trump will get everything straight. christie and people like that don t even believe in the second amendment. host: let me ask you this. next debate is about national security. what do you want to hear from the candidates? caller: what trump said was on point. a very respected general. lissen, i believe that my grandfathers who fought in world war ii were very intelligent people. and the people ahead of them were intelligent. by saying you re at war with a theology, fundamentalist, you don t know where people stand. they are in our country just like if a rules committee? you have a president just want to keep important people that are going to grow up and b
these are unifying things within our party. we believe it will help propel not only the nominee but help us win. mike: last question. of a julyility nominee how worried are you about a deadline? speaker ryan: i do not worry about stuff like that. i am not. mike: what are the possibilities? speaker ryan: i am busy working in congress. i do not think about stuff like that. couple jake: weeks ago you are trying to get into a new routine. have you found that routine? getting there? how has it changed? speaker ryan: i have more people with me. here, i just work. i work out and i work. i have that routine. at home, it is a similar routine. volleyball and basketball on weekends. packers had a good win on sunday. jake: you were there? speaker ryan: yeah. i pretty much got myself in a routine. jake: you had dinner with nancy pelosi last night. what was the most interesting thing you learned? speaker ryan: the most interesting thing i learned this is newsworthy, that i had dinner w
and i will always remember henry saying that. and also on thursday, thanksgiving thursday, thanksgiving day, in american history tour of various native american tribes at 10:00 a.m. eastern. then attend the ground breaking ceremony diplomacy cenn washemony of the knew diplomacy center in washington with former secretaries of state and several supreme court justices at 8:30 p.m. eastern this thanksgiving week. for our complete schedule go to c-span.org. now, a discussion with the state state department special envoy for climate change, todd stern. this is hosted by the center for american progress. it runs an hour. i am i am president of the center for american progress, pleased to welcome you all here today for discussions of this. how to mount an effective response to climate change. very delighted to introduce a special guest today, todd stern. uniquely qualified to speak to us about the prospects for building the international cooperation needed to solve the climate
i would note that, in recent the raw number of crashes and deaths nationwide has decreased and that is a good thing. there is anyeve evidence based on the best the problemta that is increasing or decreasing as a share of all crashes. if we look or use conservative estimates that we have across of of the more solid studies the proportion of crashes that involved drowsy drivers and wely that to 2012 data, estimate over 5000 were killed in crashes that involved a drowsy driver. you mentioned multiple you look atnd alcohol-impaired driving. i am wondering if you can use the same technique on that data to look at fatigue-related crashes. if so, or if not, what would your opinion be? i believe it could be done. i would only do that with a couple of the data from studies that i referred to in my presentation. the national motor vehicle crash causation survey and automotive sampling system. researchers,ies, independent of the police, make the determination of whether a driver is dr