port of entry. what in your overall system today categorically prevents that? so we have a notification system. when we refuse an entry that electronic notification system not only notifies customs and border protection, but all the other fda district offices imports. and so how is that batch tagged indelibly so that that notification is meaningful so that those other ports can identify the same batch we re talking about. so as you may be aware, we ve been looking working for many years to try to get a marking rule that would provide that marking of the product. that is not in place yet. but right now, we do notifications based off the data that we have on who the importer, is what the commodity line is, and make sure everyone is aware about that shipment was refused. so if they there isn t a set marking rule. so if they change the packaging or any of the markings, they could very possibly get away with what i m describing? the system is not foolproof. i agree w
numbers, it is no secret they have large environmental and pollution problems and would like to do some production with gas. we don t have it resolved. the shale that seems to move quickest, in argentina that s just happens to be lucky it is in a fairly remote area where there has been a history of mining and there s sufficient water there so once again you happen to have found a place with the right conditions beneficial conditions for going forward. those are few and far between. i m going to come back to this issue that what really made shale takes off in the united states is the fact you had companies and land men going out handing out large checks 10 $20,000 an acre to lease the land, then oh, by the way, get an eighth of the royalties on oil and gas that comes afterwards. companies had to do that because the individuals owned mineral rights. there are just i don t believe there are any other countries, if there are, it is escaping me that have private ownership of m
i suspect because the combustion engine is getting better and better, don t need tax credits handouts, pay more for miles per gallon. maybe the real test is a battery engine. but i don t see natural gas vehicle being a competitive threat in the future to gasoline. here. thank you. david kroicher from heritage foundation. wanlt to thank you, this is an interesting panel. i was wondering if you could go back to the cameron government one of the main plans was to go after shale gas, and whether they can do it whether we will be able to our service companies will be able to get business there, is it the right kind of rock, whatever it is that s interesting. that s a big issue. i don t know whether it is the right kind of rock. i can tell you that there has been significant anti-frack back lash. but you re right, the cameron government has been enthusiastic, has been pushing this and just got another five years. so i would certainly keep an eye on that. they re going to ru
for that warm welcome. more importantly, thank you for being here today. congressman duncan thinks i have an accent. i cannot understand why. but if you have trouble understanding me, i will put the text of my speech on jeff landry.com. how about that? i am happy to be here. i m happy to be with fellow conservatives who believe in constitutional liberty. i m happy to be with those individuals who believe this nation and our principles are worth fighting for. [applause] jeff landry: i tell you what, y all deserve a round of applause. give yourselves a round of applause. give yourself a round of applause. [applause] jeff landry: you see, you are the leaders who ensure conservativism wins in 2016. you have taken your time and treasure this weekend. what a great group of speakers we have today. our slate includes men and women from across the country with diverse backgrounds, experience, and solutions to the problems facing our country. it is this diversity that makes conservativ
what do you mean by 3.0? peter: i talked to scientists and got a sense of where we are in the evolution scientifically. where it started from was the earliest humans were the ones that were largely subjugated by nature. they are at nature s mercy. technology played a major role. in the last 200 last 2000 years or so we have been humans 2.0, humans living in relatively in relative harmony with each other. humans 3.0 is i think where anthropologists call it. a that is where human start to affect the nature. our environment and own biology through technology. there is a debate when that started. some say the industrial revolution, others say it is more recent, the digital revolution. what ever the case we are certainly in the midst of it now where we are developing things like we are getting really into buyer engineering and narrow science. and neuroscience. into bioengineering and neuroscience. i developed more complex ideas of what humans 3.0 is. once it went through