Not doing the best that they can for their customer. So those instances often will be something where they may have recommended to the customer a security that is really not suitable for the customers financial condition. Or that they said something that wasnt accurate or was misleading about the security and trying to get the investor to put their assets into that product. When you are watching Late Night Television at 2 00 in the morning you see investment products, might some of those be included in the brokers and things that you oversee . They might. So we have a pretty strict set of rules about how brokers advertise. The really, really bad products if you looked at them closely you would find they are not securities. The ones where they say guaranteed 10 return. Brokers are not allowed to say there is a guaranteed return and not allowed to project the return. When i see these in a local newspaper i look closely and see it turns out it is not a prod t product. If brokers were to d
That because of our strength, the power of our banks, all we americans have to do if Congress Rejects this plan is return to the bargaining table, puff out our chests and demand a better deal. Ive heard one critic say he would use sanctions to give iran a choice between having an economy or having a nuclear program. Well, folks, thats a very punchy sound bite, but it has no basis in reality. As dick said, i was chair of the Foreign Relations committee when our party came across to enact round after round of economic sanctions against iran. Remember, even the toughest restrictions didnt stop Irans Nuclear program from speeding ahead. From a couple of hundred centrifuges to 5,000 to 19,000. Weve already been there. If this agreement is voted down, those who vote no will not be able to tell you how many centrifuges iran will have next year or the year after. If its approved, we will be able to tell you exactly what the limits of irans program will be. The fact is that it wasnt either sanc
Their life, of the iranian cycle. From the mining, the mills, the yellowcake production, the gasification, the centrifuge, out into waste. We will have an ability, iaea, what have the ability to appropriately monitor that every step of the way. If we have x amount of roger radium coming out raw urate x amount of raw uranium humming out, we dont see it going into the place, we are going to have extraordinary insight into this. In addition to that, under the Additional Protocol for Civil Nuclear programs, all of the facilities are declared. It is a Civil Nuclear program. As such, there is literally before seven visitation literally 24 7 visitation in those sites. Its only for the undeclared facility about which you have a suspicion that you have to go through the other process. We are going to have amazing insight, because they are living by the npd, or allegedly they will. That is what we have to make sure they are doing. We have daytoday insight into that. I might add, our colleagues,
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu