replacement theory, rfk jr. is herjoe. 18 years i ve been reading elections. you got my face. i have to leave on the back of death, prime time winningme the war on voter fraud. kirsten going from swing hard, jack, kansas city. what you need to know about super bowl 58 with sage steele was are you still with me? you re funny. and so you re doing i m funny and not in a good way. the emperor has no clothes.it you ve heard the saying. it comes from a famous folktale of a king swindled by a few cond men into believing they would clothe him in magical garmentsim so special, so rich that only the wisest of men could see when the swindlers draped him in their imaginary cloth. ea the king was too prideful to admit they didn t see a thing. the whole kingdom knew the king had no clothes, but his staff wae s too fearful and reluctant to break the news to the king whenreak he came ouo to the town square, the king was laughed off for being exposed and bear for three years. joe bide
buffer from criticism. they acted like they wereial me removed from the process and that social media companieso wncould make their own decisions on how to best moderate content . media platforms makede independent choices aboupendent their information. they present course. it s us upo thesp to these comps to make their own decision about the content on their platform. eir platfoand to ensure contents their own standards and policies. twitter, as you know, is a private company and theyd will make their own decisionthe yeah, right. plausibleah,e deniability is thn name of the game. just send fauci on an endless press tour claiming the science is settled and opposing viewpoints aren t just wrong,ut but very dangerous that way. joe biden gets to keep his hands clean. it seems like the people who spread the disinformation, a very energetic and seemedve gt to have nothing else to do but o do that. so we ve got to be out there,bla scientists and the general public and thosend wh
americans and their governmentm. a decade ago. the new york times admitted this. the times markedis the anniversary of 9/11 by publishinhed a piecg a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuses which explode after the 9/11 attacks. the patriot act, according to st the new york times, quote, govem quickly became a sort of shorthand for government abusenh and overreaching, which, quote, inflicted collateral damage on political dissent, religiousl liberty and the freedom of association, end quote. that is still true, in fact, truer than it s ever been,trage. and it is still a tragedy. what s fascinating is that stopd the new york times has stoppedi acknowledging it. in fact, remarkablity, there wae not a single mention oft page o the 9/11 anniversaryf yesterday. on the front page of yesterday s paper, the paper that purports to represent new york , the epicenter of the 9/11 attacks. now, why would the new york times ignore 9/11? ignore well, good question, be the new york
Biden investigation on capitol hill is legitimate. and look, is you know, i was the chairman, the oversight committee, and the white housee doesn t get to decide whether or not something s legitimate o no to be approac s going their approach. that s what they re foreshadowing. you were deeply involved inow this. yoing.ed iu the legitimacy of te hunter biden laptop. you were the senior most personh in our entire government, in the intelligence community. and tell us that experiencee. in your perspectiv e. well, first of all, jason ,ni you re right. it s not unfair or unkind has b to say that joe biden has beenn marshmallow soft when it comes. to china. i mean, things like a million americans being killed by a virus in china. and joe biden is afraid to confront president gee, on the origins of that in a labt in wuhan, those types of things do raise questions about whyb in won t he challenge or confronthu america n.s number one adversarr ? but to your point, specificallys about the
Should be a supporting a supporting act is stealingth the limelight or is doing the job better than the personh who was born to do this, that upsets people. it shifts the balance. laura , this is why a conservative mp in parliamenti is about to forward a bill that. will remove their titles. if you hate it so much, why you? cling to the title. you know, that there s married a guichael of japan. she married a guy, lefy,te roya the royal life. she s an intern at off the metropolitan museum of art history. yeah, living a quiet life. wh y can t these two have the same dignity? ecause because how else are h they goim to make money? i mean, it s notake she s not going to make it on her acting and he s not going to make itt n on his, you knowa , bravado. i don t think without a title. they need those titles. is time laura , it s time for our annual real versus fake tree debate. now, i ve recounted the dangersa of real trees for years. n arti yofiu know, i m an artificial tree ally, laura .li r