process takes so long, it will be a year and a half, two years longer. they will stretch it out. they will basically say, oh no, the scope of the deposition is too broad. no, mr. trump doesn t need to sit for the deposition. they will make the other side go to a motion to compel with the judge. they will stretch the whole thing out, even though he is the plaintiff and the one bringing the case. usually the person stonewalling is the defendant. in these cases, i think you will see trump stonewall because he doesn t want to engage in discovery. he doesn t want to hand over documents. he doesn t want to testify. tristan snell, the perspective valued as always. thank you. all right. i want to show you what happened today with one of trump s main bodyguards on the hill. senator ted cruz, he had some back and forth with a professor on the laws in his own state. remember, cruz is considered a legal genius and a constitutional scholar. did you see what happened in this back and forth about w
point where he would actually have to give sworn testimony. they will be gone by them. what is the chance he actually sits for a deposition? you say none because he would never let the suit get to discovery? i say none. i don t think will let it get to that point. they are playing a game. they know that the litigation process takes so long, it will be a year and a half, two years longer. they will stretch it out. they will basically say, oh no, the scope of the deposition is too broad. no, mr. trump doesn t need to sit for the deposition. they will make the other side go to a motion to compel with the judge. they will stretch the whole thing out, even though he is the plaintiff and the one bringing the case. usually the person stonewalling is the defendant. in these cases, i think you will see trump stonewall because he doesn t want to engage in discovery. he doesn t want to hand over documents. he doesn t want to testify. tristan snell, the perspective valued as always. thank yo