christie speculation, look at where what happened in florida over the straw poll, and when you look at rick perry s initial rise, all of it was because they weren t mitt romney, right? this has ultimately been about his inability to coalesce the establishment around him, to take his front runner status and solidify it. and, you know, he may be the last plan standing at the end of the day and all of this may play itself out and may just be like what happened with john mccain. but i tell you, this has got to be oddly both a little frustrating for team romney that all of these problems for perry and as i had one romney person say, come on. he s making himself to be borderline unqualified to do this campaign. and yet they re still losing to the guy. he seems unqualified. certainly unqualified to complete his sentence in a debate. you could find a hundred clips
he said it was a prank. the recipient, a woman said there have never been any inappropriate exchanges between anthony wiener and myself, including the tweet/picture in question. she s one of about 200 people he follows on twitter. we would love to get her side of the story, but she s been unavailable for comment. a person named dan wolf seems to be the only person who saw the original tweet and retweeted it. and that was before it was taken down. he denies hacking into wiener s account. what s odd is on may 11, someone with the name patriotusa76, a person named dan wolf tweeted chris lee was republican congressman from new york who sent this photo of himself to a woman he found on craigslist and resigned after it became public. we got the photo from gawker. wolf s tweet was sent on may 11th. that was weeks before the picture in question popped up on wiener s twitter page this last friday. yesterday, congressman wiener hoped to be able to put these questions to rest, and
me. i don t know what things have been manipulated and doctored and we re going to try to find out what happened. we ll play more of the interview with the congressman shortly in two parts. he did tell the new york times, he could not say if he was the person in the picture, in other words, not ruling it out. he does, however, flatly deny sending it. he says his account was hacked. he said it was a prank. the recipient told the new york daily news, quote, there have never been any inappropriate exchanges between anthony weiner and myself, including the tweet picture in question. she s one of about 200 people he follows on twitter. we would love to get her side of the story, but she s been unavailable for comment. a person named dan wolf seems to be the only person who saw the original tweet and retweeted it. before it was taken down. he denies hacking into wiener s account. what s odd is on may 11, someone with the name patriotusa76, a person named dan wolf tweeted it w
have you ever taken a picture like this of yourself? i can tell you this that there are i have photographs, i don t know what photographs are out there in the world of me. i don t know what things have been manipulated and doctored and we re going to try to find out what happened. we ll play more of the interview with the congressman shortly. he did tell the new york times, he could not say if he was the person in the picture, in other words, not ruling it out. but he does deny sending it. he said it was a prank. the recipient, a woman said there have never been any inappropriate exchanges between anthony wiener and myself, including the tweet/picture in question. we would love to get her side of the story, but she s been unavailable for comment. a person named dan wolf seems to be the only person who saw the original tweet and retweeted it. he denies hacking into wiener s account. what s odd is on may 11 9, someone with the name patriot 76, tweeted this chris
neil: so i say you have a conflict. judge napolitano: the spouses of supreme court justice have the same first amendment rights as the rest of us. the justices don t, they cannot stand on a street corner and take money for expressing political views but their spouses can do the same. and they are presumed to be able to rule on the basis of their own intellect and understanding of the law. neil: and you share income as a married couple? judge napolitano: you do. neil: to you have a vested interest? judge napolitano: he could have an interest in keeping the law alive so she can lobby against it, and if the law is invalid her job would go. look, for years the rule was, is there an appearance of impropriety? would an ignorant neutral person say, well, his wife works for