right? why are they so concerned about this story and whether or not it s true? after four years of empowering the biggest liar in presidential history, now you have a thing for truth? doubtful. tonight the queen doesn t deny accusations of racism. against the royal family. in the family s first public statement since the bomb drops. but people here on the right continue to savage markle and her story. something struck a nerve with them. was it a multi-racial woman speaking out against an institutional white royal family? no, no it s not about that. what is it about that? the royals aren t questioning what she says about race being used against her by them. they don t deny her allegations about conversations with an unnamed someone questioning how dark the skin of the unborn child would be. so, why are so many here on the right fringe unable to accept the story? could it be that the opposition party is passing laws that disenfranchise minorties. that are all but a constructiv
why are they so concerned about this story and whether or not it s true? after four years of empowering the biggest liar in presidential history, now you have a thing for truth? doubtful. tonight the queen doesn t deny accusations of racism. against the royal family. in the family s first public statement since the bomb drops. but people here on the right continue to savage markle and her story. something struck a nerve with them. was it a multi-racial woman speaking out against an institutional white royal family? no, no it s not about that. what is it about that? the royals aren t questioning what she says about race being used against her by them. they don t deny her allegations about conversations with an unnamed someone questioning how dark the skin of the unborn child would be. so, why are so many here on the right fringe unable to accept the story? could it be that the opposition party is passing laws that disenfranchise minorities. that are all but a constructive frau
someone like kyle rittenhouse kill people and then claim self-defense? do we need better laws that protect us better? and the answer is clearly yes after today. to listen to the way joyce just framed that, david, when she said are we safer today, it s pretty obvious to me, more people, the next time there s a protest of some sort, and it may get politicized, that gun owners with a certain ideology may feel incentivized now, may feel even emboldened. that does seem to be an uncomfortable message that may be received by some. i think that s the obvious message to take away from this, chuck. i always try to look for the silver lining when i can. but here, it s think about what happened. a kid had an ar-15 strapped to his body, and he argued that on the theory that i may face lethal force in the future because a person may who never touched him get his hands on my gun and wrestle it