Professor who focuses on ethics. The other is a former law partner of brodsky. All of this testimony is focused on brodsky himself as the legal team tries to paint him as an ineffective lawyer and argues why he is the main reason or least one of the main reasons peterson deserves a new trial. We are facing an uphill battle today. Im confident. I know what is on our side. The jury was held for two years before the trial started. They will argue that former lead attorney had a conflict of interest and that he charged a contingency fee for media appearances. They will raise the ineffective counsel issue over the decision to call kaftans divorced attorney to the stand. During the trial smith dropped a bombshell. Brodsky left the defense team in november and to this day he defends his decision to call smith to the sandstand. He does not believe petersons attorneys will be successful today and getting him in a trial. He will not win a retrial. I do not see that happening. Not the way that th