Live Breaking News & Updates on Paul Butner Butler
Stay updated with breaking news from Paul butner butler. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
coverage of a historic federal indictment of a former president of united states begins at this hour with the dramatic full statement made by special prosecutor jack smith this afternoon when he, in effect, introduced himself to the american people, speaking publicly for the very first time in his six and a half months of investigating donald trump. good afternoon. today an indictment was unsealed. charging donald j trump with felony violations of our national security laws as well as participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. this indictment was voted by a grand jury of citizens in the southern district of florida and i invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged. the men and women of the united states intelligence community and our armed forces dedicate their lives to protecting our nation and its people. our laws the protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the unite ....
Seek a speedy trial in this matter. what is that going to actually mean? that was one of the two things that jumped out at me. first as paul has noted, he was at pains. the behavior is criminal no matter what, but he was at pains to place it on a national security footing and really make clear what the risks were to us. and then the speedy trial. i know what it means, it means to have a trial completed probably by the summer so the american people can make their election judgment knowing where trump stands. that s the biggest risk, by the way, with the prospective appointed of judge only candid. not that she would somehow negate the whole charges but that she would indulge trump in what is obviously going to be a strategy of delay starting with oh i just have new lawyers we need time to get up to speed and alike. the real concern here is that we don t have a trial run its course by november 2024 and ....
Replaced, i am concerned because judges can have an impact. as paul says, over the timing and over the substance, over jury selection, ruling on objections, what evidence goes before the jury. as you can probably sense, lawrence, i have a little bit of anxiety behind judge cannon being the one to preside over donald trump s case. harry lippman, a couple of ways that she could leave the case, one is she could recuse herself. she could just say, i m not gonna preside over a criminal trial of the person who appointed me or for other reason, just recuse herself. the other being that prosecution can make a motion for her to recuse. is there any other way she could be removed from the case? it depends on how she was appointed. the third way everyone has been silly local rules, it could be that it to temporary appointment and something just ....
People go to the polls blind as to what s gonna be happening to their prospective president. paul butler, given the speedy trial rules in federal court, how much latitude is a district court judge in this case have for setting a trial date, for example? she has a fair amount of latitude, in part because trump might very well do his usual playbook of trying to delay, delay, delay. in this case, trump s best defense is going to be about the law. we know from the indictment that the facts aren t on trump s side, so he s gonna argue things like attorney-client privilege. if judge cannon keeps the place you gets to make those decisions. she gets to take her sweet time. and one more scary thing, if trump loses this case he gets to appeal and jack smith loses ....
As a matter of course a new appointee happens. but you re totally. right you can imagine, why does she want that kind of grief and scrutiny? the only thing is, when you remember what glenn was citing, she twice doubled down after receiving the harshest kind of scrutiny. so that didn t seem to be with her personality. and in terms of recusal, it s true, you can do it that way, but man, the precedent is tough and the one case it stands out to the 11th circuit, the district judge basically refused to enter a sentence in the court of appeals had ordered. so query whether that s big enough. but i have to think that the judges of the 11th circuit don t want the potential embarrassment and a year of black eyes that she could present. and if they have some possibility of either gently or not so gently easing her off, they would take it. the question is, will the law present it prevent it? paul butler, glenn has just ....