Evening. Today, we are going to take a of the whiteistory separatist movement in the United States. Time, whitent separatism is a very marginal political movement. However, in light of very important demographic and political trends, the movement could become more salient in years. That are also white separatists. Separatist denotes different longterm objectives then supremacist. Separatists want an exclusive ethnic or racial mono state. Now supremacist might also be segregationist. That is, they advocate separating different racial troops, but within the same state. Examples would include the jim crow system of racial segregation in the American South or the system of apartheid in south africa. Who claim that white separatism is little more than a facade to make goals seem and byblicly acceptable, claiming to be separatists White Nationalists can present their goals not unlike other movements around the world today. While cloaking their language, white separatists can be seen as more
Evening. Today, we are going to take a of the whiteistory separatist movement in the United States. Time, whitent separatism is a very marginal political movement. However, in light of very important demographic and political trends, the movement could become more salient in years. That are also white separatists. Separatist denotes different longterm objectives then supremacist. Separatists want an exclusive ethnic or racial mono state. Now supremacist might also be segregationist. That is, they advocate separating different racial troops, but within the same state. Examples would include the jim crow system of racial segregation in the American South or the system of apartheid in south africa. Who claim that white separatism is little more than a facade to make goals seem and byblicly acceptable, claiming to be separatists White Nationalists can present their goals not unlike other movements around the world today. While cloaking their language, white separatists can be seen as more
Mingus coloradus and his interactions with u. S. Troops. His talk is about an hour and is sponsored by the kansas city public library. My name is eli paul. It is my honor to introduce our speaker, paul andrew hutton. In keeping with his profession as a university professor, we are going to have a pop quiz. One question, pass fail. Here is the question. What do jeff chandler, charles bronson, rock hudson, and the incredibly blueeyed Burt Lancaster all have in common . [indiscernible] i think i hear the answer, and the answer is all these men played Apache Indian leaders in the movies. Jeff chandler played cochise, rock hudson played the son of cochise. Bronson was a shadow chatto. For extra credit, answer this. What made those roles so attractive to these actors . Could it be the epic nature of their struggle . Keep those questions in mind. Also keep those names in mind. Maybe not the faces. The people may reappear as paul hutton tells us about our war with the apache tribes, americas l
We were unprepared for russian response. We got a russian response and we were caught flat footed. Thats poor policy making. Thats what we need. Again, we need to engage russia and have a better idea of what theyre really thinking about, what their capabilities are, and then fashioning a policy that gets us where we want to get if not tomorrow over time. And its been bad for us, but also bad for ukraine because were in a situation where we made this commitment that we are likely not going to follow through on anytime soon, and at the same time ukraine has had crimea taken away, has been subject to this very brutal conflict. It hasnt worked well for either. If you would address this point because this is a very interesting point. Yeah, it might be nice. It might be even right to say if ukraine wants to be a member of nato, they can be a member of nato. If we dont have the stamina to follow through, our allies dont have the stamite farmina to fol through, isnt that getting sort of down a
We were unprepared for russian response. We got a russian response and we were caught flat footed. Thats poor policy making. Thats what we need. Again, we need to engage russia and have a better idea of what theyre really thinking about, what their capabilities are, and then fashioning a policy that gets us where we want to get if not tomorrow over time. And its been bad for us, but also bad for ukraine because were in a situation where we made this commitment that we are likely not going to follow through on anytime soon, and at the same time ukraine has had crimea taken away, has been subject to this very brutal conflict. It hasnt worked well for either. If you would address this point because this is a very interesting point. Yeah, it might be nice. It might be even right to say if ukraine wants to be a member of nato, they can be a member of nato. If we dont have the stamina to follow through, our allies dont have the stamite farmina to fol through, isnt that getting sort of down a