present these events. i can t give you an answer as to how successful that would be, but if that s the direction i would go back to them and discuss it with them. thank you. okay, if no other questions we ll open this up for public comment. anybody wish to comment on items 1 or 2? please step forward. okay, seeing none, public comment is closed. so, colleagues, we have these two items in front of us. we have one recommendation from our budget analyst. may i suggest before we even have a discussion on it overall can we accept the budget analyst s recommendations? it s to have rec and park request expense reimbursements within 60 days. yes. we can take that without objection. colleagues, on the underlying items, discussion , supervisor avalos. yes, i appreciate the budget analyst s report and the work of rec and park bringing in the pga tour. i think it s a significant event that the world will be watching. i don t think that it s has the right feel for what the agree
obtrusive. we ve seen verptions where the antenna is mounted on a bracket so it doesn t have the same profile as the pole, for example, but those have been taken off the table. that s a big concern. yes, we understand the aesthetic aspects. whether you are voting or not. thank you. so then specifically why we re here, in october of this year we went to our commission and sought approval of this revenue generating street light program. and it includes the terms and conditions of the master license agreement and our request to our commission for authorization for the general manager to execute these master license agreements after approval from you. the master license agreement that are before you have a term of 12 years and we anticipate that they will generate revenue in excess of a million dollars and so that s why we are bringing them to you for approval. specifically the master license agreements include a $4,000 per year fee per pole with an escalation over the 12
closed. so, colleagues, we have these two items in front of us. we have one recommendation from our budget analyst. may i suggest before we even have a discussion on it overall can we accept the budget analyst s recommendations? it s to have rec and park request expense reimbursements within 60 days. yes. we can take that without objection. colleagues, on the underlying items, discussion , supervisor avalos. yes, i appreciate the budget analyst s report and the work of rec and park bringing in the pga tour. i think it s a significant event that the world will be watching. i don t think that it s has the right feel for what the agreement should be between the rec and park agreement and the pga and i would like to see if we can get a better agreement, one with a lower threshold that would share revenue from the pga tour event, so i would like to motion that we continue the item to the, you know, maybe the end of january, i m not sure if i m going to be on the budged com
carriers have been very responsive and sort of taken those options off the table. we expect to have that kind of collaborative conversation to make sure that we keep the installations looking close to this. and what made them look bad? a little clungier, more obtrusive. we ve seen verptions where the antenna is mounted on a bracket so it doesn t have the same profile as the pole, for example, but those have been taken off the table. that s a big concern. yes, we understand the aesthetic aspects. whether you are voting or not. thank you. so then specifically why we re here, in october of this year we went to our commission and sought approval of this revenue generating street light program. and it includes the terms and conditions of the master license agreement and our request to our commission for authorization for the general manager to execute these master license agreements after approval from you. the master license agreement that are before you have a term o
The Board of Supervisors voted to continue its discussion for the request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to erect a Verizon cell phone tower on Railroad Ave.