On iranr a discussion now with the man who has advised democratic and republican president s on middle east policy, ambassador dennis ross, now a distinguished fellow and counselor at the Washington Institute for near east policy. Here is the headline on the front page of todays washington journal. Iranians threatened to break nuclear record, trump orders another 1000 troops to the middle east after irans morning on uranium. Your reaction . I am not surprised. The iranians guest i am not surprised. The iranians said they were going to quadruple the amount of uranium they were enriching, so it was only a matter of time that they would exceed the limits they are restricted to according to the brand new your deal, the jc to the iran nuclear deal. One thing to know, they have an argument to make, that the u. S. Is the one who withdrew from the accord. Second, sanctions the u. S. Has been imposing make it difficult for them now to send their excess amount of low enriched material out of the
Republicans push to get even more conservative bills through and the rsc would be where a lot of those folks are. But all along we heard the senate has been the bottleneck in all of this. So whats the excuse going to be if legislation doesnt pass . I think you heard people say this is harry reids fault and i think youre going to hear that even more. Nothings changed. You still by and large need 60 votes and harry reid still is very good at blocking legislation. And also you have the fact that the house is going to send over conservative pieces of legislation and the new Senate Majority leader Mitch Mcconnell is going to have to protect members on votes much like harry reid. You have 24 republicans in the senate up in 2016 and only ten for democrats. As good of a map as it was for republicans this year its a really bad one for republicans in 2016. Well thanks to both of you for your questions this week. Thanks for being on newsmakers. Thank you. Mr. President , the honeymoon is over. Co
We begin with your comments about Hillary Clinton. Renewed t friday, a rumors that the former first lady will run in 2016. Question is, should she . 2025853880 for democrats. 2025853881 for republicans. 2025853882 for independents. Already, many of you weighing in on our facebook page. You can also send us an email. Or send us a tweet. Good sunday morning to you. First, this morning, the cover story from the New York Times. On a republican candidate. Back from the is brink, and ready to run harder than anyone else. That is the cover story of the New York Times sunday magazine. And dan has this piece at the le online Washington Post. Fridays gathering seemed very much like a Clinton Family reunion. In attendance were scores of from across the country, many of them instrumental in helping bill clinton become president. And all are now just as determined to see Hillary Clinton get to the white house in her own right. Speakers constituted a whos who of clinton loyalist. From ly notable wer
And they didnt belittle intelligence. They did not belittle learning. The actually aspired to it and hoped others would as well. They did not appeal to americas fears. They brought forward american bravery. And they would never they never would have abandoned the war on poverty to declare a war on women, a war on workers, a war on immigrants, a war on the sick and hungry children. [applause] now i know, i know that people like Mitch Mcconnell and kelly ayotte [booing] i know they have been trying to distance themselves from the tea party ever since they nearly drove our country into default. But the truth is, sadly, there is very little difference today between the tea party and so called mainstream republicans. Just ask carol sheaporter. Just ask annie kuster. They see it every day in the now sadly unrepresentative house of representatives [applause] yes, there is very little daylight between the tea party and the republican party. Think about it. Both would have millionaires do less.