scalia also used the ruling to rail against president obama s decision to halt deportations of thousands of young people brought here illegally as children. a policy that has nothing to do with the arizona case. the president said at a news conference that the new program is the right thing to do in light of congress failure to pass the administration s proposed revision of the immigration act. perhaps it is, though, arizona may not think so. as salon.com describes it, it s a passage written by a man who obviously no longer cares that he sounds increasingly like a right wing talk radio host rather than a justice of the so it s no surprise that none other than rush limbaugh jumped to scalia s defense earlier. scalia is so right on the money on this. it boggles the mind. all arizona did was write law that mirrors federal law that
a policy that has nothing to do with the arizona case. the president said at a news conference that the new program is the right thing to do in light of congress failure to pass the administration s proposed revision of the immigration act. perhaps it is, though, arizona may not think so. as salon.com describes it, it s a passage written by a man who obviously no longer cares that he sounds increasingly like a right wing talk radio host rather than a justice of the so it s no surprise that none other than rush limbaugh jumped to scalia s defense earlier. scalia is so right on the money on this. it boggles the mind. all arizona did was write law that mirrors federal law that obama was not enforcing. and court told them today they can t do that. it is, it s disheartening. let s bring in joan walsh of salon.com, michael medved, and author and torn attorney catherine crier. where do i start? what happens to balls and strikes. katherine crier, we ll ask you.
brought here illegally as children. a policy that has nothing to do with the arizona case. the president said at a news conference that the new program is the right thing to do in light of congress s failure to pass the administration s proposed revision of the immigration act. perhaps it is, though, arizona may not think so. at salon.com describes it, it s a passage written by a man who obviously no longer cares that he sounds increasingly like a right wing talk show radio host rather than a justice of the supreme court. it s nose surprise that none other than rush limbaugh jumped to scalia s dufs earlier. he s so right on the muchone. all arizona did was write law that mirrors law that obama was not enforcing, and the court told them today they can t do that. it is, it s disheartening.