Second, but he was in a thing called the civil war. You can understand that. Andrew jackson was really, really treated badly. In fact, his wife died during the process. A lot of people said she died because of the way they were treated. I mean, she was heartbroken and broken in so many other ways. I heard that for years. And i look now, even last night i was saying it. I said, Andrew Jackson or anybody else, when you think of the fake things, nobody has been treated like trump in terms of badly. No, thats true. Thats true. Thats definitely true. There is some truth to that, willie geist. Its hard for me not to also look at the person asking the questions. I mean, are you kidding me . These networks floating trumps lies. Im not going to make fun of it or anything, but it is creating a whole level of lies that people are swallowing whole because they think thats news. They think those are facts. Thats the part thats sad. I mean, its pathetic that donald trump parallels himself to Abraham
In two states, he wanted 2016 lost in 2020 and could be key to victory this year. And all were learning about israels strike on It Food Convoy that killed seven workers from World Central Kitchen. Good evening. Thanks for joining us when most criminal trials are just days away, most Criminal Defendants and their legal teams are busy enough, just prepping their cases. Dont trump of course, is not moos. Defendants. So today with his new york criminal trial, just 13 days away, his legal team try it again to get the trial judge to recuse himself. And in short order, Manhattan District Attorney alvin bragg responded. So we begin with that as well as some Court Filings which were expecting tonight in the classified documents case, cnns Kara Scannell is following all of it. So what is the trump teams arguments for recusal this time . Because the judges gave a ruling on this list in 24 hours ago. Well, so trump is asking the judge to recuse himself in this case because of work that his daughte
It is about time to start now. I am a doctoral student. I am the chair of this mornings panel, the Electoral College, time to reevaluate . Thank you for coming out at 8 00 a. M. On saturday. Thank you to the Claremont Institute for sponsoring our discussion. Our speakers today are david frist, resident fellow at the Alexander Hamilton institute, adam carrington, assistant professor of politics at hillsdale. We will have 20 minutes for each speaker to deliver his remarks. Ton we will open up questions and general discussion. If you do have a question, please bring it to the microphone in the center so you can be on camera. I think we are being recorded by cspan this morning. Without any further a do, david first. David thanks to all of you for coming out this early morning. Be defending the. Lectoral college equally important, when we talk about a major change, discussing ae dangers of any really common to almost any plans for alternatives. There always has to be an alternative. It seem
Meeting in San Francisco. Half. An hour and a thomas good morning, everyone. I think it is about time to start now. My name is thomas tacoma i am a , doctoral student. I am the chair of this mornings panel, the Electoral College, time to reevaluate . Thank you for coming out at 8 00 a. M. On saturday. Thank you also to the Claremont Institute for sponsoring our panel discussion. Our speakers today are david frisk, resident fellow at the Alexander Hamilton institute, adam carrington, assistant professor of politics at hillsdale college, and michael uhlmann, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute. We will have 20 minutes for each speaker to deliver his remarks. Then we will open up to questions and general discussion. And one note, if you do have a question please bring it to the , microphone in the center so you can be on camera. I think we are being recorded by cspan this morning. And without any further ado, david first. David thanks to all of you for coming out this early morning
Institute for sponsoring our panel discussion. Our speakers today are david frisk, resident fellow at the Alexander Hamilton institute, adam carrington, assistant professor of politics at hillsdale college, and michael uhlmann, a senior fellow at the claremont institute. We will have 20 minutes for each speaker to deliver his remarks. Then we will open up to questions and general discussion. And one note, if you do have a question, please bring it to the microphone in the center so you can be on camera. I think we are being recorded by cspan this morning. And without any further ado, david first. David thanks to all of you for coming out this early morning. I will be defending the Electoral College. And equally important, when we are talking about a major change, discussing the dangers of any really a common to almost any plans for alternatives. There always has to be an alternative. It seems to me that there are certain advantages to the Electoral College, which have been stated by it