they are night owls, obviously. yeah, okay. you get the justins, we get the alexander twins. okay that s the way we will leave it. thank you, alex. have a good show! thanks. tonight, there is a new trump defense, bravado. votto is a spanish word which, and current american english, usage means boasting, exaggerating, which, in legal terms, means lying. so, the new trump defense tonight is i was lying. on this program, we pledge to bring to you, as soon as it is available, as soon as we have already done, every word of donald trump s defense in the case of united states of america versus donald j trump, in which donald trump stands accused of 37 counts of violating federal law, including the espionage act, and his illegal possession of government documents, including highly classified documents. today, donald trump answered questions about the two minute audio recording that flooded cable news last night, including this program. the audio recording seems to review
we will see you again tomorrow. now it s time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, lawrence. with lawrence o do i think yoa booking for over the alexander twins. we have the exclusive! i know, c ten pm is too late for them, right? i m not going to be able they are the alexander twins they are night owls, obviously. yeah, okay. you get the justin, we get the alexander twins. okay that s the way we will leave it. thank you, alex. have a good show! thanks. tonight, there is a new trump defense, bravado. votto is a spanish word which, and current american english, usage means boasting, exaggerating, which, in legal terms, means lying. so, the new trump defense tonight is i was lying. on this program, we pledge to bring to you, as soon as it is available, as soon as we have already done, every word of donald trump s defense in the case of united states of america versus donald j trump, in which donald trump stands accused of 37 counts of vi
committed the crime of falsifying business records with the intent to influence the 2016 election. then, the prosecution will recap their case and tied together testimony from their witnesses and the evidence including documents with handwritten notes accounting for just how the hush money payment was to be reimbursed to michael cohen, who testified that he did it at the direction of and for the benefit of donald trump. closing arguments will take up most if not the entire day, st which will be followed by judge mershon giving jury instructions, which should last about one hour. and then the fate will be in the hands of the jury that could reach a verdict as early as this week. trump is already attacking the jury instructions on social media. there is a significant development in florida and the classified documents case against him. jack smith is asking eileen cannon to modify the conditions of release in the classified documents case after he told the very dangerous lie abo
and present nature. his latest column is, samuel alito joins the supreme court millionaires club. thank you for joining us tonight. we just heard from congressman goldman making references to leonard leo, and you see him as the kind of unifying thread, the thing that ties all these candles together. yeah. i see him as a kind of innovator. he s figured out a solution to a real problem, the conservative legal movement which is that if you elevate someone to the supreme court they have a lifetime appointment and it s not necessarily the case over the course of their tenure of the court they re going to be completely responsive to your particular interest as an activist and maybe even buck your priorities on occasion. this is kind of what happened in 1992 it planted parenthood v. casey, where they joined with more liberal members of court to preserve, like how do
innovator. he s figured out a solution to a real problem, the conservative legal movement which is that if you elevate someone to the supreme court they have a lifetime appointment and it s not necessarily the case over the course of their tenure of the court they re going to be completely responsive to your particular interest as an activist and maybe even buck your priorities on occasion. this is kind of what happened in 1992 it planted parenthood v. casey, where they joined with more liberal members of court to preserve, like how do you fix this problem? i think what leo has figured out, it is why we see him in the stories involving these ties between billionaires and is that if you simply create a world of prestige and its steam and perks for your justices, the justices that are on your side, van social pressure and social ties can be the saying that more or less keeps them from deviating too much. and we saw, i think many of your are viewers may not be old enough to remember,