business dealings. every single republican voted to authorize the inquiry even though the year-long investigation has failed to uncover wrongdoing by the president. many acknowledge they haven t found enough evidence to actually impeach biden. do you have proof that joe biden acted corruptly to help his son? an impeachment inquiry is not about proof. i don t know that you re going to see a high crime and misdemeanor. how close are you to support impeachment of the president? we re not there. gop leadership has made clear that formalizing the inquiry does not mean impeaching the president is inevitable. republicans argue the move was in response to stone walling by the biden administration when it comes to handing over documents. the president responding shortly after that vote saying, quote, instead of doing their job on the urgent work that needs to be done, they are choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt. that vote unfolded hours after the presi
moving into this official impeachment inquiry phase. it has now been formalized. a new election year headache, house republicans have officially opened an impeachment inquiry against joe biden as they look into the family finances. this morning continued questions, though, for proof, any proof of high crime or misdemeanor. a judge pushing pause on the federal election subversion case against the former president. what does it mean now for that march trial date. u.s. intel says nearly half israeli munitionop gaza. that means they re unguided and precise and they could be contributed to the staggering civilian death toll. cnn this morning starts right now. house republicans have officially launched their impeachment inquiry into president biden, even though they ve struggled to say what he did wrong or show any evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors after 11 months of digging. republicans voted along party lines unanimously to formally approve the probe with zero su
Weapon, particularly in a capital case where the person is saying they re innocent? you re exactly right. and that s exactly the question to ask. there is a principle in our legal system that applies to criminal cases called finality. the idea is at a certain point, after a defendant, even a capital defendant, after a defendant has had a certain number of pappeals, the idea is we close the courthouse doors. we simply say, i m sorry, i m turning away from this case, it s closed, it s done, we re not listening any longer. it s final. this is an incredibly harmful and damaging principle in the criminal legal system. it is something that anyone who has been wrongfully convicted, capital or otherwise, has to fight, even in cases where there is dna evidence that hasn t been tested. other forms of forensic testing yet to be done. you re always pushing that that, you know, snowball up the mountain, pushing against that