Are going to be. So just to clarify on the issue of the net new tralt. Youre advocating for a open sbrelt which would then have structure to ensure that the platform itself isnt abused. There two issues. Net newt tralt in the United States one of the issues around net new tralt is whether or not you are creating different rates or charges for different content providers. Thats the big controversy here. So you have big wealthy Media Companies who might be willing to pay more but then also charge more for more spectrum, more band width on the internet so they can stream movies faster or what have you. I personally, the position my administration as well as i think a lot of companies, is you dont want to start getting a differentiation in how accessible the internet is to various users. You want to leave it open so that the next google or the next facebook can succeed. Theres another problem though. There are other countries and i think this is what you were alluding to that feel comforta
In that way, legitimizing the Palestinian Authority, which has already been legitimated politically in the fatahhamas reconciliation agreement. Finally, as part of that assessment, to uphold the principle abu mazen has repeatedly advocated. One government, one law, one gun. The guns can only be in the hands of the Palestinian Authority. They cannot be a lebanon solution with militias and terrorist groups retaining their guns. That would be the ideal process. One in which israel should be able to accept that in the process of disarmament there is the full opening of the passages. Finally, to the journalists question. If i compare it to the end of the clinton administration, when we tried to get a comprehensive deal and failed, that led to huge disappointment that contributed to the circumstances that caused the outbreak of the intifada. I do not see that as a comparable situation. Nobody on either side seems to believe it was possible in the first place. Both sides did their best to rei