exactly breaking news. it s standard operating procedure. and yes.t tulsi gabbard won tha primary and then the seatse the democratic national part y took a deep interest in her. and you can see why he was a smart, appealing thirty one year old who knew what she believed and could shplain fluently. and by the way, she was also an iraq war veteran. tulsn political terms, tulsi gabbard was near perfect and they got it immediately. barack obama endorsed her right away. nancy pelosi called herled he personally and invited tulsi gabbard. did you remember this to speak on the opening night ofc the democratic national convention and then when she was sworn into congress in january , the dnc named tulsitha abbott, vice chair otif the national party. she just got in there thd she was vice chair of the dnc. and then, of course, the mediaay played its prescribed role. if nancy pelosi likes you also, do they so fawning profile, fawning profile emerged if you the timprofeelgton at ,you
no iw, this is the high ranking agent who allegedly attempted to slow walk to hunterrobe probe in 2020. now tonight, fox news has confirmed that bo is no longerf with the bureau. we did reachr out to the fbi fr a statement. they declined to comment. former president trump speakin g out, blasting the bias and abuse of the fbi, quote,, fm tonight. sadly, we have seen this before. former top agent by the , by tho peter strug was also once the f the fbi bureau,once you might remember formber p political bias. rememberrior to th prior to thee sixteen presidential election, he texted his colleague, his lover lisa page said he had a plan to stop trump from ever becoming president , will stop him. he also texted abo about an insurance policy of heart policy that they discussed in r&fice, did didn t work. in other words, the russia hoax to smear slander, besmirch donald trump in the unlikelypred event that he does becomenepresd president first to of course, to prevent him from everene
that harmed children, close businesses and churches, even the endless re upping ofg emergency covid o powers, the destruction of historical markers and statuesal, the use f big tech as proxy sensors forme the current regime. all of this, all o of it pointst to one ugly, inescapableug conclusion. our governmentpabl is being run by a cadre of powerful post american forces. our current political leadership acts as thoughol our constitution and the freedoms protected by that constitution areoms no longer valid. they ll always be a reason forn them to ignore our constitution these days like systemic racism, they ll talk climateid change or another covid variant, maybe gun violence january six and they won t explicitly sayay at least not yet. but they don t want us to live under a constant illusion. that leaves the primary decision making to the people of the 50 states , nor thatnt they want the designation americans d citizen to really have any special meaning at all for any of us
americans and their governmentm. a decade ago. the new york times admitted this. the times markedis the anniversary of 9/11 by publishinhed a piecg a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuses which explode after the 9/11 attacks. the patriot act, according to st the new york times, quote, govem quickly became a sort of shorthand for government abusenh and overreaching, which, quote, inflicted collateral damage on political dissent, religiousl liberty and the freedom of association, end quote. that is still true, in fact, truer than it s ever been,trage. and it is still a tragedy. what s fascinating is that stopd the new york times has stoppedi acknowledging it. in fact, remarkablity, there wae not a single mention oft page o the 9/11 anniversaryf yesterday. on the front page of yesterday s paper, the paper that purports to represent new york , the epicenter of the 9/11 attacks. now, why would the new york times ignore 9/11? ignore well, good question, be the new york
protect china? take the banking sector, for example, it was just years ago when the big wigs of wall street decided to fall in line behind black lives matter, remember? and al sharpton, all that. that was after george floyd s death that they railed against american racism. in social media posts. and then they went on to commit billions to promote racial justice, ended up being in large , say, giveaway to racial hucksters coast to coast. but when pressed in congressional hearings this week on chinese abuses, we do condemn the ongoing human rights abuses in china at the hands of the chinese communist party can condemn is a very strong word. yes, it is . so is and slavery. yes, we certainly are very distressed to see it going on and we do not want to have human rights abuses happening anywhere in the world where we or anyone else operate. it should distressed. did she say she was just distressed about it? i d say things are pretty distressing for hundreds of thousands bein