but certainly when you re looking at this case from the outside and you see brian come home with the family for several days and then sort of out and now seemingly in hiding, it s very easy to point a finger at him. but i would just hope or suggest that we do what all of us in the legal profession are trained to do, which is only follow the evidence that s actually there and keep the suppositions to a minimum. well, obviously there s a lot of people who are looking at the parents, blaming parents as well. again, we have no idea what knowledge they had or had it s important to point out. i think we just don t know. it s very easy from the outside on cable shows for people to be hurling invectives and criticizing and making assumptions. but again, the facts actually do matter still in this world. if laundrie is captured, what is the i mean, conversations between a child, or an adult child and his parents, are those things which is there some
it s very easy from the outside on cable shows for people to be hurling invectives and criticizing and making assumptions. but again, the facts actually do matter still in this world. if laundrie is captured, what is the i mean, conversations between a child, or an adult child and his parents, are those things which is there some obligation for families to come forward or is just saying i m not going to discuss anything in this subject matter to police, is that okay? witnesses actually don t have an affirmative obligation to come forward necessarily. they re not allowed to do the opposite. they re not allowed to actively interfere with an investigation. they re not allowed to harbor a fugitive. they re not allowed to obstruct justice. even accessory after the fact, which is helping somebody to continue to get away with the crime, you know, the getaway car