get hurt. we begin tonight with a simple rule of legal professionals. in most cases whenever possible, keep your clients off tv and avoid letting them do interviews, which usually do more harm than good. unfortunately, donald trump s lawyers are needy, attention craving client could only hold out for so long, so last night on one of his favorite shows in an interview with his friend, sean hannity, he seemed to make a losing argument even worse. in his latest throw spaghetti at the wall defense or is it throw ketchup at the wall? trump made this outrageous claim about his magical powers to declassify documents. if you re the president of the united states, you can declassify just by saying it s declassified. even by thinking about it. because you re sending it to mar-a-lago or to wherever you re sending it. and it doesn t have to be a process. there can be a process, but there doesn t have to be. you re the president. you make that decision, so when you send it, it s decla
Specifically to implement the hov lane and look for more Permanent Solutions 9 nature of the trait options of the corridor that he settled own an express lane corridor a upcoming to the hot hov toll so the single occupancy vehicles so how do you implement an express lane partially need funding the 2000 retail tax leverage for other states and federal funding and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority to we didnt it exist we were agency and alameda transportation Investment Agency i think that the acronym the two agencies along with santa clara form the carpool Transbay Joint Powers Authority to become a Power Authority and the legislation of ab 22 that allowed the tolling of grade i 680 that same legislation allowed the ac c to toll a second corridor within alameda the third thing we needed to implement the express lane a consensus between the public, the politicians and the other agencies involved you have consensus in the ball park through is a lot of issues surrounding the express lane
The funding strategy to high americans with disability speed rail and they are dubious priority criteria. At best. And members of the public can but the other issue is that, request kurb ramps online. High speed rail is predicated on a San Francisco to la trip being or by calling the 311 telephone no more expensive than an line. And as well. Airplane trip. So, i am available to answer any and so that ultimately is a questions that you have and also constraint. There are Agency Public project and to the extent that san managers here as well. Francisco starts putting thank you for your presentation. Passenger facility fees on, and just going back to the worker san jose starts to put the passenger fees on, we will fall protection installations. I know that the cac chair brought up the issue regarding exceed that constraint and dome the high cost at around 12 the high speed rail, and it just million, could you just explain seems like a house of cards. Why the high cost . If i can address t
Committee report, this is an information item. Welcome chris, our cac chair. Good morning, commissioners. I am here to report on two items that we discussed at our cse meeting this month. Item number four in your packet, the 12. 7 Million Dollar prop k. We approved this unanimously. And it will just make a comment on when we discussed this. Being accustomed to seeing the high dollar amounts to some items some were taken back by the high cost of the much needed protections at the six facilities. And while the contractor portion of the allocation of the request is broken out really well, and i thank mta for providing that. And something that jumps out at us that was not explained and i hope that they can explain today a little bit further, is the nearly 2 million for the Construction Management and support and engineering and project manages management and it seems high. And the prop aa criteria and we approved this unanimously, and it was changed and removed the languages in the plan, a
Good morning, and welcome to our plans and Program Committee meeting of the for tuesday october 11, 2016. Im tang, chairing this committee. And to my left we have commissioner v avalos, and peskin and from sfgovtv, we would like to thank jennifer and mark. Could we call the role . Avalos in frechlt present. Farrell . Absent. Peskin. Present. Tang. Present. We have a quorum. Thank you. Item two . Item two, Citizens Advisory Committee report, this is an information item. Welcome chris, our cac chair. Good morning, commissioners. I am here to report on two items that we discussed at our cse meeting this month. Item number four in your packet, the 12. 7 Million Dollar prop k. We approved this unanimously. And it will just make a comment on when we discussed this. Being accustomed to seeing the high dollar amounts to some items some were taken back by the high cost of the much needed protections at the six facilities. And while the contractor portion of the allocation of the request is brok