Therere was Seisismic Acactivity In N seattle. Anchchor the Swswifties Danced Andnd jumped soso muc. Ananchor the e equivalentntf a a 2. 3magnititude earthqhqu. Tayloror swifts i impact on p culturure today isis extraordid. The concncert, fromm my undnderstandingng, genenerated billllions of dodo. Vanessa a yurkevich h One Econt Susuggests thahat taylor s sw, through h her us touour, coud add 5 billion to o us gdp. If Cacari Champioion youre e o 8080, you knowow a song off Tataylor Swiftfts. Nate rogers i in modern pop timemes, You Havave Yoyour creamoofthecropop ar. And taylor swift is probably arguably the tip of the top. Anchor Pop Star T Taylor Swis Takiking her rececordbreakikins tour t to the big g screen. Cari c champion t there sees to be e not only a a fascinati, but an O Obsession W with wht shes sininging, who o she singg to, who heher friends s are, whwhat these s songs mean n to. We have e a dedicateted nfl Cacam To Taylolor Swift in all of f these gamemes. Ive neverer, i
therere was seisismic acactivity in n seattle. anchchor: the swswifties danced andnd jumped soso muc. ananchor: the e equivalentntf a a 2.3-magnititude earthqhqu. tayloror swift s i impact on p culturure today isis extraordid. the concncert, fromm my undnderstandingng, genenerated billllions of dodo. vanessa a yurkevich:h: one econt susuggests thahat taylor s sw, through h her us touour, coud add $5 b billion to o us gdp. if cacari champioion: you re e o 8080, you knowow a song off tataylor swiftft s. natete rogers: i in modern pop timemes, you havave yoyour cream-o-of-the-cropop ar. and d taylor swiwift is proboy arguably thehe tip of the top. anchor: : pop star t taylor swis takiking her rececord-breakikins tour t to the big g screen. cari c champion: t there sees to be e not only a a fascinati, but an o obsession w with wht shes sininging, who o she singg to, who heher friends s are, whwhat these s songs mean n to. we have e a dedicateted nfl cacam to taylolor swift in all
therere was seisismic acactivity in n seattle. anchchor: the swswifties danced andnd jumped soso muc. ananchor: the e equivalentntf a a 2.3-magnititude earthqhqu. tayloror swift s i impact on p culturure today isis extraordid. the concncert, fromm my undnderstandingng, genenerated billllions of dodo. vanessa a yurkevich:h: one econt susuggests thahat taylor s sw, through h her us touour, coud add $5 billion to o us gdp. if cacari champioion: you re e o 8080, you knowow a song off tataylor swiftft s. nate rogers: i in modern pop timemes, you havave yoyour cream-o-of-the-cropop ar. and taylor swift is probably arguably the tip of the top. anchor: : pop star t taylor swis takiking her rececord-breakikins tour t to the big g screen. cari c champion: t there sees to be e not only a a fascinati, but an o obsession w with wht shes sininging, who o she singg to, who heher friends s are, whwhat these s songs mean n to. we have e a dedicateted nfl cacam to taylolor swift in all of f th
withth prejudicece that accused ththe singer ininterviewer r 23: denind the alallegations,s, and now w both sideses have agagreed to enend the suiti. no word onon the termsms of ay settlementnt between t the part. chloe melalas: the lawawsuit hahas been droropped. it s beeeen dismissesed. ththere s goining to be nono t. and everybybody is wononderin, how did d this happepen? and why?y? dometi p pong: so ththere s a questionon of who wiwins, rig? are there e winners oror losersrs in this c case? and i i honestly t think thee are nono winners, , no loser. anand i think k ultimatelyly, r stalematate is a winin for muc because itit opens thehe door r each n nuanced casase that cos after itit to be jududged onon its own m merit, and wiwithout the e noise of e prececedent thatat would havavn seset if taylolor swift wown or i if sean andnd nathan wo. but if shehe would have won t this case,, it could h have been a nail i in the coffffin for mumultiple smamall artiss who fefeel like ththeir
and all l of a suddeden, my p phone is gogoing off. inteterviewer 2222: taylor swift hahas finallyy shaken offff a copyrigight infrfringement l lawsuit ovover shake e it off . intervieiewer 23: itit s a cocopyright ininfringementnt e with h huge induststry implicac. intervieiewer 24: ththe judge e dismissed d the case withth prejudicece that accused ththe singer ininterviewer r 23: denind the alallegations,s, and now w both sideses have agagreed to enend the suiti. no word onon the termsms of ay settlementnt between t the part. chloe melalas: the lawawsuit hahas been droropped. it s beeeen dismissesed. ththere s goining to be nono t. and everybybody is wononderin, how did d this happepen? and why?y? dometi p pong: so ththere s a questionon of who wiwins, rig? are there e winners oror losersrs in this c case? and i i honestly t think thee are nono winners, , no loser. anand i think k ultimatelyly, r stalematate is a winin for muc because itit opens thehe door r each n nuanced casase