therere was seisismic acactivity in n seattle. anchchor: the swswifties danced andnd jumped soso muc. ananchor: the e equivalentntf a a 2.3-magnititude earthqhqu. tayloror swift s i impact on p culturure today isis extraordid. the concncert, fromm my undnderstandingng, genenerated billllions of dodo. vanessa a yurkevich:h: one econt susuggests thahat taylor s sw, through h her us touour, coud add $5 b billion to o us gdp. if cacari champioion: you re e o 8080, you knowow a song off tataylor swiftft s. natete rogers: i in modern pop timemes, you havave yoyour cream-o-of-the-cropop ar. and d taylor swiwift is proboy arguably thehe tip of the top. anchor: : pop star t taylor swis takiking her rececord-breakikins tour t to the big g screen. cari c champion: t there sees to be e not only a a fascinati, but an o obsession w with wht shes sininging, who o she singg to, who heher friends s are, whwhat these s songs mean n to. we have e a dedicateted nfl cacam to taylolor swift in all
withth prejudicece that accused ththe singer ininterviewer r 23: denind the alallegations,s, and now w both sideses have agagreed to enend the suiti. no word onon the termsms of ay settlementnt between t the part. chloe melalas: the lawawsuit hahas been droropped. it s beeeen dismissesed. ththere s goining to be nono t. and everybybody is wononderin, how did d this happepen? and why?y? dometi p pong: so ththere s a questionon of who wiwins, rig? are there e winners oror losersrs in this c case? and i i honestly t think thee are nono winners, , no loser. anand i think k ultimatelyly, r stalematate is a winin for muc because itit opens thehe door r each n nuanced casase that cos after itit to be jududged onon its own m merit, and wiwithout the e noise of e prececedent thatat would havavn seset if taylolor swift wown or i if sean andnd nathan wo. but if shehe would have won t this case,, it could h have been a nail i in the coffffin for mumultiple smamall artiss who fefeel like ththeir
your sympapathy lays in thesese situationons. but inin terms of f shake it t, look, she e has so manany his to h her name ththat givingg up 50% o of this onene song is not goioing to breaeak the b. she s gogoing to bee absolutetely fine. and d many artisists haveve preemptivively gogone throughgh this stepe. and i i wouldn t b be surprisd if t they settleled too because ththe publicneness of a a trial, i i think, is much momore damamaging ultimimately. and the e payout couould be mucuch larger.. [clolock tickingng] chloe melalas: it was s a quit monday, , slow news s day. and all l of a suddeden, my p phone is gogoing off. inteterviewer 2222: taylor swift hahas finallyy shaken offff a copyrigight infrfringement l lawsuit ovover shake e it off . intervieiewer 23: itit s a cocopyright ininfringementnt e with h huge induststry implicac. intervieiewer 24: ththe judge e dismissed d the case
that t they had bebeen out there, thahat they re e fair u. theyey also are e alleging t t itit s a moneyey grab fromom l and butlerer, that thehey see s as an opopportunity y to make my off of t taylor swifift becaue she s soso incrediblbly success. but t it s obvioious that tatr knknows how ththe game shohod be played.d. taylylor swift w wrote look what y you made meme do . [tayaylor swift,t, look whahau made me dodo ] (singining) lok what you m made me do.o. lookok what you u made me do. and then s she gave crcredit o the three e members ofof right d frfred becausese she said,d, e arare similaririties betweween g and theieir i m toooo sexy h. [right s said fred, , i m to sexy ] ( (singing) i i m too sy for r my shirt, , too sexy fr my s shirt, so s sexy it huru. natete rogers: y your optionos eieither to chchange the s s, or your opoption is toto reah out to thehe person whwho wroe ththe song youou re worrieid abouout and cut t them a dea. get them i involved inin the songngwrit