and if it is , what should wewe do about it?to those questions are significant enough that we wanted to find someone who could provide a definitive answer. elon mus k seemed like the right about person. musk has been thinking about a a.i. and worrying about it for most of his life. nearly a decade ago, hel he hele found a nonprofit research project called open a i. and the point was in the name,,n if we re going to have artificial intelligence and apparently we are, it ought to be open, open to the s use world that would help ensurer go that it s used for good and not evil. odotvil.that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio a
and if it is , what should wewe do about it?to those questions are significant enough that we wanted to find someone who could provide a definitive answer. elon mus k seemed like the right about person. musk has been thinking about a a.i. and worrying about it for most of his life. nearly a decade ago, hel he hele found a nonprofit research project called open a i. and the point was in the name,,n if we re going to have artificial intelligence and apparently we are, it ought to be open, open to the s use world that would help ensurer go that it s used for good and not evil. odotvil.that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio a
is of the 5.lert fox news alert the house and voted to 162 07 to hold merrico garland in contempt for refusing to hand over the robert heardle interview. every republican voted yes except 1 ohio congressman davidn joy s whd o voted no. what s next that s what everyons is wondering because in terms of the contempt it s up to doj to decide if they pressed chargesfr and go after their boss it s unlikely they do that and house republicans know that as the swinan ae why they will force am of vote on inherent contempt. that s what they saw on the house floor this evening basically meaning if it passes the house sergeant at arms willr be forceced to go and the rest g merrick garland because he is in contempt a privilege motion can bring that to a vote in the next 2 legislative days having eyesot on or after they voted on theha house floos r not doing that jut yett the may be trying gathert o support for that resolution a historic day of the house first time in a long time they vote