welcome to hardtalk. thank you. good to be with you again, stephen. it s good to talk to you. you, of course, are a medical doctor. you have many colleagues in gaza. communication is very difficult. but does it seem to you right now that there is any semblance of a functioning medical and humanitarian system left inside gaza? no, the situation in gaza is absolutely drastic. it s a huge humanitarian crisis because not only of the israeli siege on gaza, but also, of this terrible bombardment. we ve lost up to now more than 10,000 people who were killed by israeli air strikes and bombardment. we ve lost 6,000 children 6,000 children, stephen. nothing can justify that. but on top of that, israel is depriving gaza from fuel, from electricity, from food, from water and from medications. we have 17 medical teams working there around the clock. they do their best, but they tell me that the situation is intolerable. first of all, we have more than 130 children in incubators who coul
prevail in this military face of this, experts say could take up to a year. the former minister made that pointjust in the last 2a hours. so the idea that they will get to a kind of stable occupation status where they can patrol and secure security without risk to themselves is probably a long way off and possibly a mirage entirely. so who are the leaders, possibly a mirage entirely. so who are the leaders, who possibly a mirage entirely. so who are the leaders, who are - possibly a mirage entirely. so who are the leaders, who are the - possibly a mirage entirely. so who l are the leaders, who are the players who can come in to try at some point whenever that may be, to broker some kind of framework for negotiations? at the moment all sides have got the leadership that they do not deserve. hamas are horrific but the trouble is that rivals the palestinian authority who rule in west bank are geriatric, out of touch, cynical and have done very little for their people. on the
with inflation and all the other problems that this country has, i think it is a disgrace. the $250 million lawsuit was brought against mr trump and his family by the new york attorney general s office. the judge already ruled that mr trump is liable forfraud the trial is now exploring what he ll have to pay in damages. after court, new york attorney general letitia james defended her case, and said mr trump engaged in distractions while on the stand. he rambled. he hurled insults. but we expected that. at the end of the day, the documentary evidence evidence demonstrated that he, in fact, falsely inflated his assets to basically enrich himself and his family. he persistently engaged in fraud. for more on mr trump s day in court, i spoke with our north america correspondent gary o donoghue who s been covering the trial in new york. this really wasn t about the law. if you had any kind of legal strategy in a case where the judges the guy that gets to decide, going out of t
king s speech is aimed at people who should be solly tories, they are trying to bring back the base, get themselves back up to 30, 32% regularly and hope that as the economy improves that brings back some of the switchers, the challenge, though, is that some of the language and the home secretary s remarks are part of it. some of the net zero stuff that might win back conservatives might further push away some of the moderate swing voters and make it harder for people saying they are voting for keir starmer. iis harder for people saying they are voting for keir starmer. voting for keir starmer. is there eo ard voting for keir starmer. is there jeepardy in voting for keir starmer. is there jeopardy in anything voting for keir starmer. is there jeopardy in anything tomorrow l voting for keir starmer. is there i jeopardy in anything tomorrow for the labour party? nick was talking about the bear traps that are being set by the conservatives. yes. about the bear traps that a