Op Ed Shows News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Op ed shows. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Op Ed Shows Today - Breaking & Trending Today
The idea of possibliy resigning. Whats unclear is how serious that was. Whether he said Something Like i am willing to resign if the president wants me to or whether he said i intend to resign and im going to do it on monday. We dont know the exact nature of those conversations. Eli, i want to hear about your reporting. I want to show our viewers what phil rucker is talking about. Lets watch. I have a message for the president tonight. Under zero circumstances should the president fire anybody. If you are laying a trap for donald trump, this might be exactly how youd do it. Okay, professor, what will President Trump do now . Well, if hes smart, hell take advantage of this and not fire either any of these people, not mueller, not rosenstein, and not sessions. So this is important point because i think a lot of people are really scared after the
rosensteins people to come out ....
Before the unanimous op-ed shows up in the new york times, a cabinet official was talking about invoking the 25th amendment and bringing other cabinet officials along to that judgment. and offered to wear a wire to expose the chaos in the white house. he should have worn one today because the white house looked chaotic today. back to the substance of this. the substance of what rosenstein was reported to have been concerned about in may of 2017 lines up with the omarosa book. lines up with the unanimous op-ed and every page of the woodward book and seems to be another pillar in this picture that from the inside, the trump presidency is much more alarming than what we see from the outside. that the substance of that report was three weeks into rosenstein s time at deputy attorney general. he had exposure to him in two big instances. the dealings around the comey firing and the second was his dealings with the president when he sat in on all the interviews for potential fbi directo ....
Discussed. the woodward book, the omarosa book, unanimous op-ed and report friday about rod rosenstein. should we start separating the cabinet secretaries, put them in categories of political stooges and truth tellers? who goes in what category? mattis and rosenstein belong in the truth teller category. 25 years in the federal government, 25 years in the fbi, lots of gallous humor and joking. never once did anyone ever joke or mention the 25th amendment involving the president or wiring up against the president, even in jest. and i have to tell you something first. that s the first time i ve heard the full clip from mike pompeo. he specifically mentioned the fbi. as somebody that, as a team that needs to fulfill the mission of the president, that is not the role of the fbi. and on a larger scale, as you re saying, when it comes to the 25th amendment if you think the president is unable to fulfill his duties and powers, you re on team america. ....
Security council relugs, even with all five vetoing members going along with it, or in self-defense. he is correct about that, isn t he? this is the problem with the current state of international law. thank you, yes. in the sense that if you happen to be a friend of one of the permanent members of the security council, you don t really have to worry about the law against mass murdering of your civilians being enforced. that s what assad is profiting from, because putin is saying no, no, no, whenever the security council wants to investigate assad s atrocities. whenever it wants to send the atrocities to the international criminal court. when it even wants to condemn the atrocities, putin says no. that s the law that s in perfect state of the law, as it exists today. do you think that the american reaction to the putin op-ed shows i m curious as someone who has to deal with the sort of international view of human rights, ow you interpret americans reaction to the putin s op- ....
this is the problem with the current state of international law. thank you, yes. in the sense that if you happen to be a friend of one of the permanent members of the security council, you don t really have to worry about the law against mass murdering of your civilians being enforced. that s what assad is profiting from, because putin is saying no, no, no, whenever the security council wants to investigate assad s atrocities. whenever it wants to send the atrocities to the international criminal court. when it even wants to condemn the atrocities, putin says no. that s the law that s in perfect state of the law, as it exists today. do you think that the american reaction to the putin op-ed shows i m curious as someone who has to deal with the sort of international view of human rights, ow you interpret americans reaction to the putin s op-ed? frankly, i was happy that the times published it. i wished that the times counterpart in russia would publish something on huma ....