Veracity of this, the integrity of the entire process, he calls it anonymous, gutless, coward. there is a journalistic history of protecting people for purposes set to serve the public interest. that s exactly right. i would add to your point, phil, i don t know who this person is, the new york times editorial page does.ri they published his piece or her piece a year ago but the newsroom does not know or i don t know the white house team does not know, we re separate in our organization.se you re right. this the reasoning i think that the editorial page people n gave is that like the times when we used anonymous sources to provide important information for our readers, they thought this was an exception to the rule where we normally identify writers of op ed pieces, the character and writer they were talking about was sufficient importance to alert the public. clearly, the publishers feel the
President attacks the very veracity of this, the integrity of the entire process, he calls it anonymous, gutless, coward. there is a journal list tiistic of protecting people for purposes set to serve the public interest. that s exactly right. i would add to your point, phil, i don t know who this person is, the new york times editorial page does. they published his piece or her piece a year ago but the newsroom does not know or i don t know the white house team does not know, we re separate in our organization. you re right. this the reasoning i think that the editorial page people gave is that like the times when we used anonymous sources to provide important information for our readers, they thought this was an exception to the rule where we normally identify writers of op ed pieces, the character and writer they were talking about was sufficient
Of the entire process, he calls it anonymous, gutless, coward.ir there is a journalistic history of protecting people for purposes set to serve the public interest. et that s exactly right. i would add to your point, phil, i don t know who this person is, the new york times editorial page does. they published his piece or herh piece a year ago but the newsroom does not know or i don t know the white house team does not know, we re separate i our organization. you re right. this the reasoning i think ht that the editorial page people gave is that like the times when we used anonymous sources to provide important information s for our readers, they thought po this was an exception to the t rule where we normally identify writers of op ed pieces, the character and writer they were talking about was sufficient importance to alert the public. clearly, the publishers feel the same way. now it s a stunt obviously
Are appalled, they re nervous, but they re counting on the democrats to nominate somebody like elizabeth warren who will be a foil for the president and basically say no matter how awful i am, look what the democrats are going to do. so you re going to be seeing a lot more of that, as well as that message that they re not coming after me, they re coming after you. that s at the heart of the trump playbook. the fact he s held three in a week, what does that tell you about where his mind is right now? i think he s a lot more comfortable being out there with the adoring crowd than in the white house where he s under siege, where you have this tsunami of opposition coming. it s been a terrible week for him. you can argue yesterday was one of the worst weeks of his presidency. you re starting to see admirable writing op-ed pieces in the new york times, republicans being more willing to speak out against him. you re seeing house republicans
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20190610:07:40:30 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.