both trump and mixon trying immediately and repeatedly and initially to avoid accountability. when the president does it, it mean that it is not illegal. by definition. exactly. i have to right to did whatever i want as president. in the years of my life i welcome this examination. i did everything right and they indicted me. i m not a crook. i m an innocent man. i did nothing wrong. many people faced accusations will do some kind of accounting. then there s evidence that piles up. if it were one of these movie plots you would say, are they rebooting the plot? do they not have other ideas for the plot? but evidence always matters in these cases, matters in court, and the secret tapes and recordings have an echo through
knowingly submitting a certification saying they were produced when he knew it wasn t true. like yogi berra, the famous yankee catcher said it s deja vu all over again. this was the same thing mixon orchestrated during the watergate cover-up obstructing justice, trying to get people to change their stories, paying hush moin, destroying document, all of this was done some 50 years ago, so not much new in ear actually, even the approach he took saying he wasn t a crook was pretty much replicated by donald trump the other day with that video. that was the first thing that went through my mind. the second, this is a pretty solid indictment in the sense that the allegations are put together pretty neatly.