rachel: maybe a 16-year-old shouldn t have been there. we can debate that. the idea of protecting your hometown, i m sorry. lawrence: that is such a good point. i have that point of view. there is a difference between personal opinion in the eyes of the law. rachel: 100%. lawrence: i don t think he should been there. i wouldn t have sent my child there. that is your prerogative. what does the court of law say? it was self-defense. it was clear there was overzealous prosecution. it is clear they were politically motivated. it is clear they didn t do the research. tried to change the legal strategy in the middle of the trial. they didn t care about the constitution as they tried to take people s constitutional rights. they were on a witch-hunt in this case to please the mob. i was looking at an old naacp card and at the back of the card it says that they are anti-mob justice. recently they have changed that at the back of the card. but there used to be a consensus
a country right now. thank god the jury looked at the evidence. will: i had lunch with a buddy, he just learned in last 48 hours that the two men shot by kyle rittenhouse were not black? he is not paying only attention to bravo. i can t believe until the last 48 hours i thought the people he killed were black. move to race. you bring up a larger narrative. if you listen to people, quite honestly less reputable cable channels whatever they may, the real only indictment of kyle result 10 house is that he is white. that he is white. lawrence: exactly. will: leo terrell was on justice with jeanine. thank god lady justice has a blindfold on. thank god justice is color-blind. the left plays the racist card because they re racist. for their agenda they had to play the race card. there was a color-blind verdict.