scheduling hearing on the matter for thursday. this, of course, is all coming as the office of national security announced their own review of the documents to determine potential refuse for national security. talking all of this over, and possible developments i wanna bring in washington post josh joce. josh, let s talk about to the latest developments right in tandem with one another that may very well be related at the end of the day. first you have this intelligence assessment which will be ongoing, ranks? the damage possibly done by the documents that were being held in mar-a-lago. you combine that with this possible appointment of this third party, essentially, to look over these documents. if in fact that happens this coming thursday as the judge that, she has the intent to do so. how could one hold up the other if it happens? the former president has repeatedly asked for someone to look through the documents. it has been a couple weeks since he made that request. it
Commitment to upholding International Rules of the road, including freedom of navigation. Just this past week, the prc vessels acted as dangerously and unlawfully as our philippine friends conduct a routine mission in their own exclusive Economic Zone in the South China Sea. I want to be clear, i want to be very clear. The United States defense commitment to the philippines is ironclad. The United States Defense Agreement with the philippines is ironclad. Any attack on the filipino aircraft vessels, our mutual Defense Treaty with the philippines. And, mr. Prime minister, today we renewed our commitment to defend the values at the heart of this alliance, and we continue to stand as one to forge a Better Future for both of us and all the region. So i want to thank you again for being here. Thank you for your partnership, and your leadership in this critical moment. And id like to now turn it over to you. Well, thank you very much, mr. President. Australia and the United States have stood
baby would die shortly after birth. they told me that i should terminate the pregnancy because the state of louisiana s abortion ban, they could not perform the procedure. basically they said i had to carry my baby to bury my baby. that was nancy davis, a woman in the state of louisiana who found out ten weeks into her pregnancy that her baby had a rare birth defect called acrania, or the skull does not form inside of the womb. babies with this defect not survive past the first week. as you heard, nancy could not get the abortion the doctors recommended after the minions trigger while banning abortions went into effect. that law is not being challenged in court. nancy who has three other children is planning to travel to another state to get the procedure. for more on, this i want to bring in jenny lawson executive director of planned parenthood votes. jenny, thank you for joining us on this. in the first reaction to what
of mississippi, you re not going to then target iud or plan b, which are methods of birth control that might not allow a fertilized egg to be implanted? this is not a theoretical construct, this is not the state of louisiana, which is a neighboring state, not your state, but they re talking about not only criminally charging girls and women who get abortions as, you know, as being committing homicide but they re also talking about defining the moment of conception as fertilization, which would theoretically, if this were to become the law of louisiana, and it is not yet, mean murder if you use an iud, you re committing murder, theoretically. i m not making this up. these are the conversations going on in legislatures in your area. but just to be clear, you have no intention of seeking to ban iuds or plan b? that is not what we are focused on at this time.
there is nothing in the u.s. constitution that precludes individual states from regulating or restricting abortions. and that s the ruling that the court should make. but again, all we have is a leaked draft. we don t have a final no, i agree. i agree. but just to be clear, the state of mississippi, you re not going to then target iud or plan b, which are methods of birth control that might not allow a fertilized egg to be implanted? this is not a theoretical construct, this is not the state of louisiana, which is a neighboring state, not your state, but they re talking about not only criminally charging girls and women who get abortions as, you know, as being committing homicide but they re also talking about defining the moment of conception as fertilization, which would theoretically, if this were to become the law of