updated? i don t have the answer for you on that. there s a number of policies relevant for this. that may affect you ll commit to providing those to us to explore them together? i will commit to provide a briefing that will have very helpful information. what about a written policy explaining how commercially available information can be used in criminal investigations? i think it s all wrapped up in the same answer i just gave. the reason that this is so important is because the question is whether the fbi uses that data to generate leads for investigations only or further along in the investigative process. there s public reporting on dhs contracts with the same data brokers that i mentioned earlier totalling millions of taxpayer dollars. as you know in the 2018 supreme court decision in carpenter versus united states, the court held that it s a violation of the fourth amendment for the government to access historical local data without a warrant. does the fb
because the security clearance determinations are made by odni directeder, the security clearance manager, which is not the fbi director. i don t want to insert myself in to the process while appeals are pending. as a leader, it s important. we need to have the opportunity to have whistle-blowers and talk to congress and talk to us on issues. to restore trust in the fbi, it s imperative for you to allow whistle-blowers to come over. the fbi is tanking. it concerns me. i come from a fairly rural district. the concern is weaponization of the doj coming after conservative american citizens that just want a voice in the process. i would encourage you, mr. o boyle, i understand he s been suspended since september of 23, almost ten months now,