conference at the capitol. i just got off the phone with the president, i talk to him twice today, and after weeks of negotiations, we have come to an agreement in principle. we still have a lot of work to do, but i believe this is an agreement and principle that is worthy of the american people. i expect to finish the writing of the bill, checking with the white house and speaking to the president again tomorrow afternoon, and then posting the text of it tomorrow, and then voting on it on wednesday. thank you for your time, and i think this is very worthy of the american public. we do not have the full scope of the agreement, as the speaker, noted the bill is still being written as we speak, with the intention of completing it by later today. now, from what nbc news has gathered so far, the deal will to raise the debt limit until 2020, five it will keep it roughly flat while giving a slight boost of funding to defense, and if we are providing a new controversial work r
derailment have been prevented? if so, how? the answer to that question will eventually come from the ntsb, which is currently investigating the crash, but we can and should take a look at the conditions of rail freight across this country and the allegations that across the industry safety is being sacrificed for profit. we spoke with one 40-plus year veteran railroader and certified accident investigator who told us what happened in east palestine was the logical outcome of precision schedules railroading. and that without change it will happen again. we re going to explain what that means in a moment with greg reagan, the president of the transportation trades department of aflcio. it s important to understand the operating conditions because the crash itself is becoming a political football. donald trump is touring the derailment site, and the mayor of east palestine who told us on this show the other day that he didn t want president biden to visit because the security d
defeat erdogan. erdogan is hard to defeat he was a leader of an opposition coalition, why isn t that working in a place where erdogan does have a lot of opposition up? it is working, it is working to the extent that this is erdogan the most formidable challenge since he s been in power, so in a way, it is shown that it is really effective in challenging autocratic leader who enjoys expansive power, not only over the government, but who control something like 80%, 90%, of all of the media here. so the fact that kilicdaroglu is doing as well as he is, and this big coalition is doing as well as it is, just speaks to the efficacy of compiling that group together. but there is some skepticism that if he does get elected, if he does get into power, it is going to be hard for him to hold all of those odd bed fellows together, especially since, just two weeks ago, we saw that there was a parliamentary election during that first round of the vote. that put erdogan s akp in very
analyst, melissa murray. the lower courts struck down the cases repeatedly. why would the supreme court say, yes, they would take it up if they re going to be as skeptical as they so far have been? well, i think the court was looking for a limiting principle here, and the case that was heard today is about a more limited procedural question, whether the anti-terrorism act actually shields internet service providers like twitter from liability for aiding and abetting. the broader case that was heard yesterday on section 230 is about the bigger question of whether internet service providers can be held liable under section 230 simply because they are a medium for which other users can share material that may be unlawful or can incentivize. what you saw is a strange coalition of odd bed fellows where individuals who were arguing that conservatives were being silented and people who are arguing that the internet
decades, housing over 200,000 inmates. 40% over capacity. you tell the american people we have a federal prison system costing taxpayers millions of dollars but the mission isn t peag met, that americans should be overboard, just so angry about this because this is a sample of that program not working. when you think about the amount we spend every year $80 billion, not just millions but $80 billion, to house mostly nonviolent drug offenders, some sentences to decades or life in prison, people would be astonished by those numbers. also there s an opportunity here, because there is such bipartisan pometropolitanm m momentum, such a collection of odd bed fellows, the koch brothers and aclu pushing rand paul to say we have got to do something to dial back all of the injuries we heaped upon communities from the war on derogs in the 80s and 90s. you can t talk about it