possession, and i i remain confident that that was done in a thorough and careful way. uh-oh. now it s mike pence. and his lawyers. got to be hard. i said it can t be that hard. it s hard. can t anybody play this game? what you ve got to be asking. well mike pence s lawyers are explaining how classified material ended up at the former vice president s home. more on the timeline and the response from pence s team in just a moment. also ahead speaker kevin mccarthy again rewards marjorie taylor greene. this time with placement on a subcommittee investigating the coronavirus. mtg previously had been kicked off social media platforms for spreading covid misinformation. great. plus, a special grand jury s report on efforts to overturn the 2020 election by former president trump and his allieses. it will stay sealed for now, but the d.a. is promising imminent action in the case. good morning to morning joe. it s wednesday january 25th. with us host of way too
i think is circles back to persuading them it s in their own self-interest to do t. richard, i love the book, know. the conversation around facts and opinion, interpretation, it s a complex one. not just it s not sufficient to just simply to recognize a fact, because we can come at it a number of different ways. a suspicion. ask this question. a kind of provocation. a broad public cannot acquire the skills requisite to be the deliberate body democracies requires. written in 1922, 1925, and given complexity of lie folks just don t have the bandwidth to do what democracies require. now you re saying obligates to be informed.
because, again, if the five officers were black, race is still involved, because the person who was beaten to death was black. what s what s your best explanation from talking to the family, talking to others on why these five police officers beat their child to death? they re really, they re grappling for explanations in the conversation i had with them on the phone and there really is not explanation, other than police feeling they have the right to do whatever they want to do, and they get in these gangs of playing with people like they re just some kind of obligates to take out some kind of violent misbehaviors. almost masochistic, but whatever it is, i think they must face the law. they should be prosecuted, and it cannot stop the activists in memphis, need to be supported by
when he going to delete the white house twitter account. saying that you re keeping i on twitter because it might be suitable platform. i want to be clear here, the president has always said, and he has been very clear in his belief it is important for social media platforms to continue to take steps to reduc hate speech and misinformation. get this lady looks down more often then somebody trying on new shoes. sheet must say, she says the site must reduce hate speech an disinformation, obligates the left that seems to corner that market. he is not just make that you ha been threatened to be in twitte unless it on content moderation. the european head told musk he must adhere to a checklist of roles including ditching an arbitrary approach to reinstating the end-users.
filing after, lawsuit. revised language it says the same objective is religious universities accuseded of discriminating against lgbtq students. slavery was an institution. right? lots of things are institutions. are you concerned that garland is such an institutional, even willing to uphold bad institutions, to be an institution? this is more than upholding institutions. this is about upholding a federal law, section 1681, a3. the justice department has, maybe it s a solemn obligates to defend federal laws. this case is about that federal law. it s not surprising that the department defended it. we, defended obama, president bush hated feingold, defended that as well. that s not unusual. i ams did appointed about the garland decision here is not the defense but that they didn t couple it with the statement that said, look, we re going to go to congress and try to get